• kimara@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The article doesn’t say they do this. It says: “In theory, a service could charge you more if you’re on a vacation in a foreign country, instead of your hometown, because they know you would be willing to pay more. It would be the same if your phone’s battery is low and you’re trying to get home.”

    A really bad headline, but not surprising I guess.

    • Coldcell@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, next they’re going to reveal they’ve been mining your calendar data this whole time after a data breach forces them to admit it.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Look, does it really matter whether they do or not? If a company is morally bankrupt enough to conduct business like this in the first place, it’s a certainty they’ll just find some other novel way to be flaming assholes.

    If you don’t want to get cheated, stop doing business with thieves and liars.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Personally, I’d rather have a robust and up-to-date set of consumer protections rather than leaving everything up to ‘buyer beware’.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That would be ideal of course, but this is the US we’re talking about, so it seems unlikely that you’ll have them.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Because they pay apple? I’d imagine that’s obvious. It’s more useful metrics for the developer. I would be surprised if they didn’t tier the information access about users behind closed doors.

      Android’s not perfect, but at least permissions can be set per app, you can root your device, or install GrapheneOS or Lineage to bypass this crap entirely.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’d rather the ability to fudge these stats to developers, cause my info is none of their damn business, especially when I’m paying for a service.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That can be done on android and other operating systems. Apple is always the SOL option when it comes to dodging this crap.

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean, they absolutely could and it would be absolutely trivial to compare a database of crime rates to your departure location. The question should really be “Are they checking if I’m in a shady neighborhood?”

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Did they ban AI from using proper titling case?

      The answer is no, and this may be one way in which AI should be allowed to displace humans Who Write Titles By Capitalising Every Word Even The Ones Which Should Not Be.