“Race” implies there’s a finish line. The tech won’t get to a point where the additional value a worker can produce when using it outweighs the additional cost of having the worker use it. (And keep in mind, according to some estimates, said additional value is 0). And LLMs won’t get to a point where they’re actually intelligent. The “I” part of “AI” is a not something we can reach with our current technology. In fact, we can’t currently define what intelligence even is.
The English equivalent would be “Don’t hold your breath”
People who want AfD to govern vote AfD. Everybody else votes something else. The Wagenknecht party may be willing to form a coalition.
That’s young as far as round space stones go.
It is evidence of a deep rot infesting America.
Which is why he needs to weasel out of paying death benefits.
In order for this to work, the private key used for signing has to be on the camera, and would have to be kept secret from the camera’s owner. This is not possible. You can make it more difficult, use all sort of tricks to hide the key, but in the end, once somebody knows how you hide the key on their device, they’ll always be able to find it. And once they have found the key, they can sign whatever false picture they want.
Trump’s ego is more important than anything.
Give Putin some credit. He’s doing this much more intelligently. He maintains a plausible pretense to not pay out death benefits while Trump just goes “No”.
You did not say what they should do.
Doing nothing would have worked out much better for them.
Also the implication that Russia is supposedly not winning when it has been advancing is rather silly.
Thing being, Russia hasn’t been advancing.
Haha. What you are saying is actually “I can’t prove that A killed B, but A definitely murdered B!”. Do you even know what a genocide is?
Maybe re-read my post. That being said, genocide is a deliberate effort to destroy a national, racial, cultural or ethnic group entirely or in part. The crimes against humanity committed by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs constitute such an effort. The UN might disagree, because they are slaves to capital, and capital would like to keep trading with China.
So far, the only source the proponents bring.
It’s not.
Malpractice would be if Amnesty International had kept promoting the testimony after evidence had failed to come to light. You’d have to show that they acted maliciously and/or recklessly, which they didn’t.
Also, your argument for why Amnesty shouldn’t be trusted is because they fell for a fabricated testimony 35 years ago. If that’s all you have, then it’s actually a glowing endorsement of them.
Decades of NATO higher-ups saying that expanding towards Russia will cause war with Russia,
Nations can join whichever alliance they wish, assuming said alliance lets them. What you’re describing here is a condemnation of Russian imperialism, not pushing for war.
refusing Russia’s membership in NATO
Russia never applied for NATO membership, there was nothing to refuse.
and admitting that the war was preventable by Ukraine not pushing to join NATO
By the same logic, world war 2 could have been prevented by just giving the Nazis whatever they want.
Sure, that does make NATO more cautious, but NATO has still been targeting civilians, has been carrying out strikes at nuclear power plants, has been committing war crimes against Russia, all without Russia using nukes
That’s not true. Russia has been doing those things to Ukraine constantly throughout the Ukraine war, though.
Considering that Russia has been beating NATO in this conflict, it seems that the only myths that got broken were of NATO’s capabilities against near-peers.
NATO isn’t a belligerent in this war. Your statement is nonsense.
What should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (i.e. NATO) starts amassing troops and weapons on its borders (or otherwise in position to attack, like with Iran), especially after a coup against a neighbouring state?
Maybe not invade a neighboring country yourself, and then keep investing material and manpower after the invasion has stalled for no discernible gain.
The one that hasn’t been substantiated, one which the NATO-dominated UN concluded to there being no evidence for, one which your masters have long since stopped pretending to believe to have happened?
What the UN conclude was that while there are reeducation camps and systemic discrimination, there is not sufficient evidence to say its a genocide. Which is like “We can prove that A killed B, but we can’t prove that it’s murder”.
And no, Adrian Zenz’ word is not proof.
Funnily enough, it’s only ever the deniers who bring up this guy.
Oh, hey, it’s the same people that sold you on Nayirah’s testimony. Do you believe that one, as well, since Amnesty said it was true?
That’s a quite deliberate misconstruction of the facts. Amnesty International initially promoted the story, then they issued a retraction once they found that it lacked supporting evidence. There’s no evidence of malpractice on their part.
NATO has been (self-admittedly) pushing for the war with Russia for years.
No, they haven’t.
Also, consider that your suggestion didn’t work for, for example, Iran. Iran did nothing, and yet, you empire still attacked it.
Russia has nukes. Iran doesn’t.
Better how?
They would be at peace, and the myth of their military might would still be unbroken.
Berlin wall, for one. Yeah, it was done by the German Democratic Republic, not the USSR, but DDR was a puppet of the USSR, so the USSR is culpable here, just as the USA today is culpable for what Israel is doing.
Supposedly build to keep fascists out, but if that were true, they’d have build it the other way around. If you shoot at a fascist before they attack the rampart, you start an offensive war with West Germany, which you don’t want. Meaning, a theoretical attacker on the West German side of the wall could roll up with heavy construction equipment and just knock the strongest part of the defense down, before shooting back is allowed. In fact, since the wall is opaque, the guards wouldn’t even know what is happening until the wall is breached. Which is probably why the West Germans got to decorate their side of the wall. Of course, no West German would have a reason to breach the wall, because they were just allowed to cross over at the official check points.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine is bad, for example. The Genocide against the Uyghurs (https://xinjiang.amnesty.org/).
Funny thing, if Russia had just done nothing, they would be better off in every conceivable metric.
KMT
I don’t think those guys were around when Stalin was still alive. They do seem to be doing some interesting stuff though. Doesn’t look imperialist though.
This tool argument bothers me. Tools are things you can become really good at using. You can’t get good at using gen AI.
Whoever murdered Epstein must be feeling really dumb right now, given that basically nobody in the riles faced any real consequences.
Is “inbestros” a typo or a new term?