Naaah surely we aren’t gonna go to the tree we are specifically told not to go to no matter how it calls to us.

Thank you for the response. I actually went into a bit of a deep dive into this after posting and learnt a lot about it.

So it’s a shit post, but riffing off of a recognised previous communication, that’s essentially saying it doesn’t matter who the discrimination is coming from as long as it’s happening?

I don’t know what amab, afab, terf is. I’m guessing something along all men are x, all female are X?

Can you explain the queer centred bit please?

Not trying to attack, just very unfamiliar with this stuff and that one stood out, so I want to know what it means before even considering it.

I disagree, because Donald is already owned by many other famous figures, many predating trump. It is a name with notoriety, but it is more in grounds with say Napoleon Bonaparte, and other such significant political entities. The dilution period for his name will be even sooner than Napoleon though because of the popularity of his name, so we probably won’t see it entirely disappear from naming conventions the way Adolf has. It might raise eyebrows within certain social circles for a while, but honestly not much more, particularly as you leave the American sphere of influence.

Yikes you do know a bulging battery is a fire risk right?

*DDR3