superkret@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 month agoOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.orgimagemessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1832arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1825arrow-down1imageOS market share in Top 500 supercomputersfeddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square170fedilinkfile-text
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer_operating_system Author: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Benedikt.Seidl Data from: http://top500.org/stats
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoGood point. But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoHeh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
minus-squareAscendantSquid@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoI don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoHeh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoOh that was hyperbole, I didn’t expect to be taken literally!
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoLol. Well good guess. I’m not a primary source or anything, of course. Your comment just matches something I heard once in office gossip.
Good point.
But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.
Heh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
I don’t think either of the chart’s axes list efficiency?
Heh. I don’t think that number was ever official, but I heard it as well.
Oh that was hyperbole, I didn’t expect to be taken literally!
Lol. Well good guess.
I’m not a primary source or anything, of course. Your comment just matches something I heard once in office gossip.