• BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lemmy world just removed their non-discrimination clause and one of the admins is (poorly) justifying it in a thread about it. I wouldn’t cheer quite yet.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Totally. I would love to stand up an instance but it’s a little above my tech knowledge and, frankly, I don’t want to have to think about the legal aspects of what happens on it.

        If I ever somehow did it, I would probably not allow photos/videos. Disable downvotes. Things like that.

      • nybble41@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        The more users spread out into smaller, more easily censored instances, the more the remaining fragmented bits of the Lemmy ecosystem still talking to each other will turn into echo chambers full of groupthink. This low threshold for defederation is the Fediverse’s greatest weakness. Sure, it’s possible to work around it—but how many separate Lemmy accounts are users expected to create? Even if you have accounts on every instance of note you’d need to manually cross-post messages to each balkanized server and their comment sections wouldn’t be shared—exactly the sort of thing federation was meant to avoid.

        Email, another federated system, has this same weakness. It’s why it’s increasingly difficult to run your own (outgoing) email server which other systems will accept messages from without going through a well-known third party like Google. Especially when trying to push content to a large audience (e.g. mailing lists), which happens to be Lemmy’s core function.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Bluesky is using content addressing to deal with this, although currently it is only built around feeds and not forums. Your profile is truly portable and posts can optionally be retrieved from “mirrors” (one of the CDN-like servers called BGS) so you don’t need to rely on your current hosting server (the account hosts called PDS) to federate with everybody.

    • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agreed. In order to keep a upvote/downvote based platform from becoming toxic, a lot of good moderation is required. Lemmy.world is definitely not doing that.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            I do think they have a lot of similar culture issues, make no mistake. But stormfront was literally a white supremacist website. It was the explicit purpose. I think we’re not quite that bad around here lol

            • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Stormfront was blatant. .world is a lot more ‘subtle’ and crypto- about it, but make no mistake, the same supremacy lives there. I know what to look for on that charge, I’ve been seeing it and living isolated by it for years now.