I would like to introduce you lovely OpenSource Lovers to a GIT-Alternative called FOSSIL that I also stumbled upon because of this Blog.<br> It’s basically opensource Github-in-a-box which means it’s an SCM with:

  • Bug-tracker
  • Ticketting-system
  • Forum
  • Wiki-system
  • even a Chat-functionality
  • Has built-in GUI
  • Also has a Web-Server
  • Self-Hostable like Gitea/Forgejo

& the best part it’s all in ONE STANDALONE FILE!!! which is extremely lightweight which you can copy to your $PATH & works even in crappy internet. how cool is that!!

However this tool supports a completely different style of development in FOSS called the “Cathedral-Style” whereas GIT suports a “Bazaar-Style”<br> The person behind Fossil is the creator of SQLite, <u>Dr.Richard Hipp</u> & they even made other projects to support Fossil like a PIC-Like language called PikChr<br> Well just in case; here’s a list of difference between Git vs Fossil<br> & guess what!! they even have a hosting service called CHISEL

Listen; Just check it out & use it for fun in your spare time even with the flaws it has (& Try out Darcs & Pijul as well)

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    & The code behind Linux isn’t ? People back then did some REAL sorcery with coding

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      back then? both codebases are fully modern. its more that sqlite uses a style that differs from the accepted norm quite a bit. that, and they don’t accept contributions.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yeah it’s the cathedral-style, Opensource but closed contributions as in no PRs

          • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 days ago

            I would say its still open source. There is no requirement to be able to contribute modifications back. It is more about the availability of the code and what you can do with it.

          • ZeroOne@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            You’ll actually have to talk to the devs to be included in the project This VCS favours a more horizontal organization where the devs know each other (so A <u>high-trust environment</u>)

            Please don’t pretend as if OpenSource Devs don’t constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

            • Markaos@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              Please don’t pretend as if OpenSource Devs don’t constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

              <i>I</i>'ve <u>seen</u> much <b><u>more</u> complaints</b> about <a href=“https://0.0.0.0/random_img.tiff”>people</a> constantly <marquee>demanding</marquee> their specific <h1>annoyances</h1> to be fixed without ever <i>submitting <u>a single <b>line of code</b></u></i>. <i>Maintainers</i> are pretty much <b>universally</b> welcoming to code <h2>contributions</h2> <br><br><br><br><br><br>

              I soooo hope this does something funky with someone’s Lemmy client