nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agoTim Sweeney doesn't hold back: if you think the Epic Games launcher is bad, it's because it isen.softonic.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down15
arrow-up1176arrow-down1external-linkTim Sweeney doesn't hold back: if you think the Epic Games launcher is bad, it's because it isen.softonic.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down14·2 days ago So is your solution to have Valve hire more people and be less profitable? That would justify their fees? No, they should have charged lower fees. You talk like a shill. You’re literally defending a billionaire who made his money overcharging gamers for decades.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 days agoIf they camharge lower fees they would be getting allegations of pricing out any competition and get a lot of bad will. It’s a lose lose situation with the solution you are proposing
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-22 days agoLowering fees would have resulted in everyone liking them even more.
No, they should have charged lower fees.
You’re literally defending a billionaire who made his money overcharging gamers for decades.
If they camharge lower fees they would be getting allegations of pricing out any competition and get a lot of bad will. It’s a lose lose situation with the solution you are proposing
Lowering fees would have resulted in everyone liking them even more.