• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s fucking unreal just how completely lost you magats are. Just fucking upside down in relation to any sort of reality.

      This is just too hilarious. The people that are completely out of touch with reality are people like you who say things like this.

      • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Says the guy who actually believes that felon musk doesn’t censor the everliving fuck out of any sort of dissenting view on his privately owned nazi platform.

        Just. wow.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          But there are “dissenting views” all over X? Pro-Democrat policy and ideology views are not censored. Pro Trans/Palestine/Abortion/every-other-left-wing views are not being censored.

          Which views are being censored on X in America? What evidence do you have to support your claim?

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Clearly, because even that article is bullshit and couldn’t find 10 despite naming it “Elon Musk, King of Censorship: 10 Times the ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Silenced Twitter Users” lol

          Government ordered takedowns are not Twitter censoring people - it’s the government.

          As for “cis” and “cisgender” - they’re considered slurs on there, but they’re not censored. You can go on there and post “cisgender” as much as you want.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              They operate within the law. If a government says you either ban an account in their country or you stop providing your service to the entire country, which do you think X should do? Because those are the options - follow the law or exit the country.

              X are challenging the government legal orders in court btw, but in the meantime they have to cooperate. Like I said, the government are the ones censoring free speech here, not X. Do you not see the difference? To operate in a country you need to follow their laws. Not every country has free speech constitutionally guaranteed btw.