• plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand why cell phones don’t authenticate the towers they connect to. Is this really just a “standards lag behind modern security” thing, or is it on purpose to allow these Stingray devices to be used?

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I assume it’s the same as the Internet (or more specifically HTTP): It wasn’t designed with security in mind.

      Unlike HTTP, for some reason it wasn’t included in a new specification, though. My guess is that’s because of the more centralized nature of cellular networks. The barrier for entry is a lot higher as well so there are few but big players who have little incentive to improve over the bare minimum.

      IIRC encryption was initially proposed to be part of 5G but got shot down in the process.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Wait, 5G isn’t encrypted? I think it does have some protections still. I mean, not that it would matter to me, they only use NR-NSA in my country so it isn’t even full 5G with all its advantages.

        At the risk of sounding like an AI-generated ad, I use an app called Privacy Cell on Fdroid, that confirmed there is no true 5G anywhere in my country. I just wish there was a way to differentiate between the two versions of 5G natively, kinda like 4G-LTE showing up as LTE instead of just 4G.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Encrypted data channels can still be vulnerable to man in the middle attacks. Like when you connect to an unknown host with SSH, and the client pops up a big warning.

          In this case, ICE or whomever sets up a “valid” cell tower that your phone connects to, and they (law enforcement) route your packets onto the rest of the Internet. They can decrypt the 5G data, and see all of the IP headers. They can’t necessarily read the TLS traffic, such as https. But most important of all, they can log all of the IMEIs that connect, which effectively gives them a database of all of the protestors.

    • utopiah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      why cell phones don’t authenticate the towers they connect to.

      I believe it’s because they assume it’s not necessary because it was until now

      • prohibitively expensive, but now a “tower” is less than 2k EUR e.g. https://www.crowdsupply.com/ukama/ukama
      • prohibitively complex, see above, namely you don’t need to be a TelCo engineer to get it going
      • probably illegal, namely you needed (and I bet still need in most places) wireless band allocation before you could deploy anything

      … so I imagine there was no authentication because there was no practical threat beside few “fun” examples in CCC or DEF Con.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The use of Stingray by US law enforcement has been challenged on grounds that the law enforcement agencies have no spectrum license. Those challenges seem not to have found success.

        On the other hand, prisons in the US have been stopped from operating cell phone jammers on prison grounds, on the same complaint of no spectrum license.

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even if they did, I don’t see government having trouble getting a proper authentication key.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      IMEI/IMSI are collected (and immediately linked, hence deanonymized even if SIM was inserted only once) by cell tower operators. Just not bring your device, period.

      • plz1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I agree with that personally, but realistically, “your phone was near a place” is not the same as “you were involved”. If they hijack a phone onto a Stingray, they can get way more info than just IMEI.

        • eleitl@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Think long term movement patterns, correlations with others such, anomaly detection.