• تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The real reason is because France is being kicked out of Africa so they have to turn inwards and colonize their own people.

    The more African countries free themselves from the shackles of French imperialism, the worse it will get for the average French. Then it would be very easy to sell them the next war for them to needlessly die in.

  • Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    French officials daring the population to bring out the guillotines? Time is a flat circle.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, they actually submitted the idea of removing two national holidays to “save money”. The dishonest part here is “to fight Russia”, even though the next budget is expected to increase the army’s budget.

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh yeah, it’s to totally send boots in Russia and walk on Moscow of course, we’ve almost done it once, we can do it again!
          That’s totally not a big jump to a fantasized conclusion fed to y’all by known Russian propagandists. The author of the article somehow manages to grasp the problem and dishonestly draw wrong conclusions from it.

          There are many reasons to increase the Army’s budget. Funneling money to Macron’s friends in the armament industry is one of them, preparing the public opinion for a war that will never happen to justify “sacrifices” and austerity is another.

          I don’t think there’s any point in debating about this on .ml anyway. You’ve probably made up your mind about this already.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There are many reasons to increase the Army’s budget. Funneling money to Macron’s friends in the armament industry is one of them, preparing the public opinion for a war that will never happen to justify “sacrifices” and austerity is another.

            These are probably also reasons, but you think war with Russia isn’t on the minds of every government in Europe right now? They’re already fighting a proxy war with Russia! At the very least I think this is one of many reasons for increased military funding.

            • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Funding the army to protect yourself and your neighbours from aggression is very different from funding the army to invade a sovereign country.

              I’m not arguing it’s not one of the reasons for increasing the budget, but arguing it’s to attack Russia is just dishonest.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                They are already attacking Russia through a proxy. They’ve not been shy about it. They are increasing military spending because they think their proxy is about to collapse and their liege the US is already demanding everyone else step up so they can pivot to China.

              • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Oh. Now I see the problem - you’re still operating with centuries-old thinking. You think “war with Russia” means France launching a unilateral invasion of Russia.

                Funding NATO is literally the equivalent of preparing for war with Russia. NATO was formed explicitly to counter the USSR. It was staffed with Nazi officers from the Third Reich on the basis that the Third Reich was 100% dedicated to destroying the Soviet Union and enslaving Russia. When the USSR was dissolved, NATO didn’t dissolve itself, it became an openly aggressive military force launching invasions of several countries under various pretenses.

                The idea of austerity for increased NATO funding can only be interpreted as money for war with Russia. Sure, you can pretend NATO is purely defensive but even if that’s the case it’s still accurate to say that France is engaging in austerity to fund a war with Russia, just a defensive one.

                The reality, however, is that the West has been hell bent on dominating Russia for over 200 years and the quintessential example of that history is Napoleon’s campaign to invade Russia - one of the deadliest canpaigns in history. And since the Third Reich was also a Western attempt to invade Russia resulting in massive bloodshed, it becomes really difficult to ignore the obvious problem of France funding NATO (remember, originally helmed with handpicked Third Reich officers) as some kind of “just defensive pact” especially when NATO dropped DU bombs on Yugoslavia in its supposed war for humanitarianism, and NATO’s involvement in offensive operations in East Asia.

                So you may take issue with the imagined implication that France is going to send an army under the French flag to march on Moscow - I think that’s silly too. But you’re arguing against a strawman.

              • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Not dishonest, but following the jingoistic remarks made by several European leaders plus the current NATO proxy war and economic murder attempt of Russia, it’s at the very least in the cards, lol. The budget could go into Ukrainian drones (it already is, this is just a proposed increase) just like the American budget serves to bomb tf out of Palestine and neighbours. It’s dishonest to say otherwise, come on.

                • xzite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  plus the current NATO proxy war and economic murder attempt of Russia

                  Wow, why would “NATO” do this? Russia hasn’t invaded anyone since 2022 2014 2008 1999 1994 1979 1968 1956, that’s such a long time ago, and those Hungarians totally deserved it.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I wish I knew where to bet on the fact that if Ukraine has a complete collapse and an unconditional surrender half of you libs will go “these Russian bots lol have fun when Ukraine unveils their gambit and kills the entire Russian government and are celebrated as heroes by everyone in the country”

    • jackeroni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is not propaganda, it is only labeled like that because of the empire’s need to discredit it

      • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Kind of like how they attempt to discredit Europe’s extremely reasonable concerns about Russia (conswidering they’ve been bombing the shit out of ukraine for a couple of years?) starting a war by calling it a “fantasy”?

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s complete bullshit, some facts are portrayed completely out of proportion and it has a clear propaganda bias.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          As opposed to what? What sources do you use that don’t portray any facts out of proportion or have any bias?

        • jackeroni@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Friend, where are you getting your facts to compare it to? Empire controlled outlets. You can not say that a certain fact is or is not being blown out of proportion when the other source for a fact can’t be trusted