Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Enterprises will love that. A perfect excuse to end wfh. However, this will cripple business travelers. I’m sure there’ll be some exception for corporations where they can exercise maximum control over their employees while still being allowed to generate capital.

    Hey UK: suck it.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      They couldn’t switch off VPNs for businesses. I work in a hospital and we use VPNs to create secure tunnels to other third party health care companies as well as NHS adjacent health services amongst other things. This is to protect patient sensitive data amongst other things. This would cripple our service and go against NHS england and government requirements for the secure transfer and sharing of data.

      This would have to be public VPNs only. Despite the fact that it would be complete bullshit either way.

      • blargle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, you could just go back to sending stuff by fax machine forever, but then instead of even using the fax machine to sync patient data just make the patients fill out their own entire medical history from scratch every time they go to a different doctor and take their word for it.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This is to protect patient sensitive data amongst other things.

        Its 2025, we no longer need such silly things. Don’t worry, its for the greater good.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Exactly. The best they could hope to do would be to create an exemption for businesses in which case I open my own fapping business.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Unless things have changed massively in the UK in the last 5 years or so, in my actual experience you don’t unless you make a profit.

            The yearly baseline costs of opening and operating a Limited company in the UK are pretty low (less than £100 if I remember it correctly).

    • atticus88th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ive got a few UK coworkers that will be out of the job if anything disables VPNs. They voted for that mess now they can sleep in their 1/3 salary local jobs too.