• thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    My mind was stuck on presidential and more nationwide elections, which popular vote makes sense. Local things should be more regional like you described. If you don’t live by the lake, you have pretty much zero say on what those that do live there say.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      100% thought you had done that, and just wanted to ramble some clarification in case. :) it’s pretty easy to focus on the “big” elections, and how what makes them shitty is essentially the “small” elections working properly-ish.

      Personally, I’ve always wondered about a system where people directly vote for the representative they want regardless of geography, and then that person represents their constituency.
      Geography used to represent a much more significant part of a persons interests, since you likely worked reasonably near where you lived, shopped and everything else. That’s less true now.
      It’s moot since we’re not changing the fundamentals of our system anytime soon, but it’s interesting to think about.