• DacoTaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Iirc this was due to the design of the chip. Framework said the bandwidth needed for the strix halo is waaaaaaayyyyy faster than the bandwidth of the sodimms that laptops have.
    Hence they made the desktop, only thing they could think of doing with those classes of apu’s

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s just soldered LPDDR5X. Framework could’ve fixed it to a motherboard just like the desktop.

      I think the problem is cooling and power. The laptop’s internal PSU and heatsink would have to be overhauled for Strix Halo, which would break backwards compatibility if it was even possible to cram in. Same with bigger AMD GPUs and such; people seem to underestimate the engineering and budget constraints they’re operating under.

      That being said, way more laptop makers and motherboard makers could have picked up Strix Halo. I’d kill for a desktop motherboard with a PCIe x8 GPU slot.