Agent Karyo@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agoToday’s game consoles are historically overpricedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down12cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1147arrow-down1external-linkToday’s game consoles are historically overpricedarstechnica.comAgent Karyo@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square38fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-212 hours agoI mean, historically it seems pretty in-line with Nintendo releases, adjusted for inflation: NES: $582 SNES: $480 N64: $410 GCN: $362 Wii: $399 WiiU: $419 Switch 1: $396 Switch 2: $449 It’s only ~$50 more than the Switch 1, and they just raised the price of the Switch 1 by $50.
minus-squareampersandrew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoIt’s the part where the Switch 1 hasn’t gone down in price that the article is talking about.
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoWhich is not what the person I replied to was taking about…
minus-squarePlantDadManGuy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·12 hours agoShhh the sweaty neck beards are venting.
minus-squareieatpwns@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·12 hours agoWith each gen we got some advancements. Now they’re cutting corners for share holders
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·12 hours agoI mean, to pretend the Switch 2 is identical to the Switch 1 is pretty ridiculous.
minus-squareieatpwns@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoI’m not implying there aren’t any improvements this time around I just feel like the improvements and corner cutting cancel each other out but that’s just my opinion
minus-squarenull@lemmy.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoThat’s fine, all I’m saying is it’s not like it’s significantly more expensive or out of line price-wise historically. More to the point, the article wasn’t talking about launch prices of consoles at all.
I mean, historically it seems pretty in-line with Nintendo releases, adjusted for inflation:
It’s only ~$50 more than the Switch 1, and they just raised the price of the Switch 1 by $50.
It’s the part where the Switch 1 hasn’t gone down in price that the article is talking about.
Which is not what the person I replied to was taking about…
Shhh the sweaty neck beards are venting.
With each gen we got some advancements. Now they’re cutting corners for share holders
I mean, to pretend the Switch 2 is identical to the Switch 1 is pretty ridiculous.
I’m not implying there aren’t any improvements this time around I just feel like the improvements and corner cutting cancel each other out but that’s just my opinion
That’s fine, all I’m saying is it’s not like it’s significantly more expensive or out of line price-wise historically.
More to the point, the article wasn’t talking about launch prices of consoles at all.