BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoGoogle won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkGoogle won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square14linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squaresorghum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up99·1 month agoThere wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
minus-squarePumpkin Escobar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1 month agoI liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·1 month agoThis tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
minus-squareBetaDoggo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoTo be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.
There wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.
This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.