• Samsuma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Developing countries, especially China, led the clean energy charge but richer nations including the US and EU relied more than before on planet-warming fossil fuels for electricity generation.

    China remains way ahead in clean energy growth […]

    India experienced slower electricity demand growth and also added significant new solar and wind capacity, meaning it too cut back on coal and gas.

    In contrast, developed nations like the US, and also the EU, saw the opposite trend.

    I’ve not read a single BBC rag article for a while now, are they usually this sloppy nowadays with how they portray the West in the best light LOL… Looks like they gave up trying mid-way. Very poetic.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the way we should view this is that “developed nations” means nations that have peaked in their development and are no longer capable of developing further. Meanwhile, “developing nations” are the ones where progress is happening. Everything makes a lot more sense framing it that way.

    • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Renewables make so much sense for a poor country, the only barrier is and has been initial setup cost - but a ton of solar panels, over their thirty year lifespan, will be much cheaper and far more reliable than an equivalent amount of coal or gas in generators.

      • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Exactly. China took the leap of the century by investing in renewables, and it paid off big time. Other Global South countries are slowly following suit. Energy, digital and cultural sovereignty should be actively sought out for lest of being beholden to Western imperialism and hegemony.