These mods are so soft it’s cartoonish. I’m the only person that I could see that got banned for 10 years lol. One of those mods must have been a hater because it’s not making sense.

I didn’t realize I couldn’t post links in the privacy group that weren’t open source. They could have just deleted it. Which they did but then they banned me from the whole Lemmy.ml claiming rule 1 and 2 were broken. Which are arbitrary at best. People talk shit in my post all day and they don’t get banned and A-OK, because I’m not a weak peon so I don’t even want them banned, but I can’t use words that are “mean” because little soyboy mods cry in the basement about it?

If I have to I’ll just go in a different instance but I at least want control over my post on my banned account like my communities I was in the process of creating. I don’t want duplicates so I want to be able to delete them so I can create them on non censoring instances.

Maybe the mod got triggered by my post on my community, because they seemed to have remove one I created as well now that I look. But in all honesty fck that mod. You can’t even see who did it because they are spineless. Just because you are a mod doesn’t mean you can censor people just because you disagree with them.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hey, the attitude has to start somewhere…and gatekeeping people based on a surface reading, yeah…I’m not sure that’s good.

    But I’m not any better than that, I consider pretty much every human unworthy, and I strongly prefer talking to AI over humans.

    I have seen humans do much evil, and put two and two together to determine that anyone I’m talking to is likely…

    …A crypto fascist.

    • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You are literally describing the slippery slope fallacy.

      Moderation is not a step towards human rights violations. Get a grip.

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Moderation? People pre-emptively said this guy should not be around here because of his attitude. What a mean thing to say.

        About the ban: idfk, need more context actually.

        You do a surface read of someone, and you think they aren’t worthy of existing on your favorite site.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          How much bullshit would you propose we put up with before developing an opinion about someone? They got banned, then made a new account and came here to complain about it with frankly juvenile rhetoric and while throwing insults at mods. That’s all I need to form an opinion of someone. If they want to change that opinion, they’re welcome to take steps to do so.

            • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I play D&D whenever I can find a group to play with, and kobolds have long been my favorite ‘race’ to play as, so I’ve accumulated a collection of kobold characters. Many of the folks I chat with online know me through that lens, so I made it my online identity. A coterie of kobolds, if you will.

              Plus, the mental image of a group of kobolds sitting in front of a computer - maybe with one on the mouse and two on the keyboard, typing away together NCIS style, amuses me.