• Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The gains compound a bit too, 20 percent less weight equals proportionally less battery capacity required to shift the now-lighter vehicle from point A to point B.

      So then you can cut the size of the battery while maintaining the same range, and that’s where you start to get significant overall weight and cost savings.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hell just replace the former motor weight with battery and you’ve almost doubled the range. If China ever mass produces solid state batteries, double it again.