What are the main differences between pipewire and pulseaudio? Which one is better? What are other alternative popular sound servers besides these two?

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Pipewire is the new hotness. I’ve read comments from various audio engineers and programmers that pipewire “gets it right”.

    Pipewire came out in 2017, pulseaudio in 2004.

    “PipeWire has received much praise, especially among the GNOME and Arch Linux communities. Particularly as it fixes problems that some PulseAudio users had experienced, including high CPU usage, Bluetooth connection issues, and JACK backend issues.”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PipeWire

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio

  • donuts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pipewire seems to do everything better than PulseAudio, in my experience. It’s stable, compatible with PulseAudio and JACK stuff, works for low latency stuff like music production, can be routed flexibly, etc… As someone who used to run a PulseAudio+JACK stack but has since replaced both with just PipeWire, I’m a big fan.