• humanamerican@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The people who needed to be convinced think the New York Times is globalist propaganda. If they even noticed the existence of this article they would assume it was a made up smear campaign against Dear Leader.

    Also, our media (even the “liberal media”) is part of the problem. For example, they did such a terrible job explaining Trump’s attempts to steal the 2020 election that to this day even many anti-Trump Americans don’t understand how fucked up it was.

    The primary blame is on the sociopaths in charge and the troglodytes who voted them in, but there is plenty of guilt to go around.

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    1 month ago

    How was anyone supposed to know he was gonna do the things he said he wanted to do. 1000002742

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 month ago

    In 2024, everything was already laid out for everybody to see clear as day - Trump1.0, MAGA’s behavior since 2021, Project 2025…

    BTW, in 2016, both Mary Trump and Tony Schwartz predicted Jan 6 21: “If he loses the next election, he won’t go willingly.”

    Ever since Jan 6 21 it’s been crystal clear where this goes if he wins again.

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    So…. I am going to express my opinion that Trumpism is merely the latest, not so different, expression of American capitalism that has always been this nasty and poisonous. And this includes the raids and round ups currently in the news.

    There are some things that changed: the targets and oppressed have changed for some. The messaging has changed.

    It’s a fad. This will fade soon enough, and things will still be bad. The good guys will be elected and clean up some of the stuff, but most of what they do will be ineffective. And then the next bad guy will come to power

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Based on what toady Mike Johnson and trump have been saying today/yesterday about how the GOP should control elections, I have a lot of worry that there will never be any more “good guys” elected.

      • limer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Many states have elections that do not allow recounts, using hidden methods to count, and flunk the same fraud checks used pretty in other counties reliably.

        Given that, I’m not too worried

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          And the ability to purge voter registrations within days of the election. Couple that with reduction in voting locations in heavy blue areas and kicking other methods entirely…

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            the stopping counting was pretty apparent in '24, they more than likely saw kamala had votes if they had counted them all.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly.

      What Donald is doing has always occurred. It’s just been better hidden, and he doesn’t care to hide any of it. The corruption we’re seeing now is only new if you’ve never cracked open a history book.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Who are the “good guys”? The only remotely non-evil person who had a serious bid for president is Sanders, the rest are straight up pieces of shit who bankroll genocides, bomb civilians, and empower their billionaire donors. Even then, Sanders is ineffective, somewhat zionist, and old, and I don’t see a viable young replacement even for someone like him.

      In the US, the political mainstream isn’t “good guys vs bad guys”, it’s 80% hitler vs 100% hitler.

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        And even Sanders parroted the “they have a right to defend themselves” rhetoric when push came to shove

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          At least he called himself a thing that we could all then google and find something better to work towards

      • limer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like there are not any good and effective leaders or movements. At least not nationally

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck that. It was predicted a full year before. This is bullshit. Stop reading the NYT. They lied about the attack on Oct 7 (claimed sex crimes that didn’t happen) and never made a retraction. I cancelled my subscription to them and to the Washington Post (cause Bezos killed an opinion piece endorsing Biden, who I voted for because fuck Trump, but Biden was a terrible candidate).

    Listen to the audio-book, “Manufacturing Consent,” from Noam Chomsky. Unfortunately, he’s in the Epstein docs, so I can’t recommend him otherwise. Oh well. All these people are monsters.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately, he’s in the Epstein docs, so I can’t recommend him otherwise.

      Also read an introductory textbook on logic & pay attention to fallacies like ad hominem. Shit’s timeless & really pays off far better than whatever joke of an education people got.

    • Bitswap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Beyond being buddies with Epstein, Noam is just a piece of shit of a person. Just absolute scum with interesting and thoughtful insights…but just a horrible person.

      • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can you point me toward some resources to learn more (aside from Epstein dump)? I have always admired his writing on propaganda and sociology but am painfully unaware of what he is like as a person.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      People who are “in the Epstein files” probably just pissed off the Moussad. Otherwise, where the fuck are the other names? Sounds like a bunch if bullshit to me. Documents can be falsified.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s photos of Chomsky and Epstein laughing and sitting together on his jet. Its not as if his name just happens to be written in the documents devoid of any other context.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Biden was a terrible candidate

      In a binary choice, he can also be the best candidate. Unfortunately many Americans don’t understand the difference between “imperfect” and “comically bad, unsuitable and incapable”. It’s too nuanced.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Donald Trump was a lot of peoples’ fault. One article nailing him doesn’t cancel out all the articles that normalized or sane washed him, or ran with his narrative. Nor does it undercut all the well-justified mistrust of legacy American media. It’s not as if people started trusting pundits out of nowhere - they started looking for commentary and news from alternate sources because yeah, actually, a lot of legacy media does report like they serve their wealthy owners. Not that MAGA pundits don’t, but that’s beside the point.

    Hell, even right now, they’re generally running with the narrative that Trump’s Israel-Gaza ceasefire has been effective by not reporting that Israel still murders many innocent Palestinians every day.

  • ReHomed@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Rightoids are unbelievably predictable. Meet one in public and you could guess everything that comes out of their mouth from the very beginning of the conversation

    Only actual fucking idiots are unable to realize how predictable rightoids are

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    many of his most reckless efforts in his first administration were stymied only because of others in his administration who blocked, delayed or watered down his aims to ensure that he could not put himself above the law or the country.

    I often wonder what would have happened if his first term was unleashed. Eg if McCain voted yes to dismantle ACA. If Trump got his way the first time, would he have gotten in the second?

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      If Trump had gotten his way the first time, we’d be in a fascist dictatorship that is 9 years old now instead of one.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the most important thing about this era is to understand how the fuck this happened. I have no answers and have never heard anything convincing. I think if humanity lasts long enough, hundreds of years of scholars will be trying to understand it. Most people on earth could’ve predicted most of this shit, yet no amount of spreading that knowledge made a fucking difference. If nothing else, this tells us how unbelievably irrational humans are.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re right about all of this. What I can’t fathom though – is that in the past, facts mattered. A lot. How did all of the propaganda literally erase that entirely? That’s what I cannot figure out. It’s not like the internet invented the concept of the lie. Before social media, at least most people would have some skepticism and if nothing else, ask their smart friend. How the hell did that go away?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              We are not a logic, rational creature. Our brains are not machines for working out problems, they’re machines for telling stories to create a coherent narrative.

              I gotta push back against this. It’s much more complicated than this. Humans have a complex brain, with some parts matching this description perfectly, and others that do not at all. If we were not capable of both being rational and prioritizing facts, we’d probably still be roughly the same as chimpanzees. Instead, we developed incredibly complicated systems for accomplishing long term goals, and throughout human history, cooperation based on rational thought has played a huge role in the direction our species took. Hell, without that ability, there probably wouldn’t have ever been a coherent ruling class. They wouldn’t have been able to put all the pieces in place to hoard wealth indefinitely.

              What I see now as a distinct change is that rational thought just literally gets turned off at will, at any moment. In the past, 98% of people would watch a video of a crime and agree at least roughly on what happened. Now people literally seem to deny what their visual cortex perceives in favor of something they heard already. That is new.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I wasn’t very clear about the cooperation part. What I mean wasn’t that you have to be rational to cooperate. What I’m saying is that you have to be rational to plan out things that take dozens or hundreds of years and effectively utilize the cooperation of thousands of individuals who are all looking to solve the same problem.

                  You are using modern societal issues like inequality as evidence that we aren’t rational, but I dispute that strongly. Those problems used to be much, much worse, literally because the ruling class used a rational but evil plan to take care of themselves. Because of rational working class fighting back in a very organized and rational manner at a few different points in history, we made progress against them. We don’t have a 40 hour work week or OSHA in America because a bunch of emotional and angry public kept trying random things without a thought. We have those things from planning and hard work. Both are examples of being entirely rational.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, most of them are just racist enough that they genuinely don’t care what else happens so long as non-whites suffer.

        Then large swaths of people who chugged the propaganda Kool-aid into thinking any other group of people achieving 1 more right or freedom meant all of theirs were being stripped away.