• randough@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He could have been part of a unionization effort, instead he chose violence, harmed his peers, and took away that possibility.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      These companies actively make that unfeesable. They’d spend the extra money to close the location. Claim it was unprofitable. And hire all new ununionized staff elsewhere.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The massive amount of product lost and the perfectly good building destroyed?

          Like, the difference is the damage — it’s a very big spectacle and proof that all it takes is 1 person in the right place and you can cause massive damage. The Dems aren’t going to save you if you don’t scare them into saving you.