when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 9 hours ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 9 hours agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregkpy@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10·8 hours agoSociety condemns one and accepts the other
minus-squarewhen@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·4 hours agoI was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.
Society condemns one and accepts the other
I was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.
This is the reason.