inari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 14 days agoOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10 cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up15arrow-down1external-linkOfficial Linux position on LLM usage in kernel developmentlore.kernel.orginari@piefed.zip to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square65linkfedilink cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days ago Because it’s not like natural intelligence is always all that great either. Wouldn’t be a proper Linus post without calling everyone else an idiot.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoI’m sure he included himself in that group
minus-squarevandsjov@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·13 days agoDidn’t call everyone an idiot, but he’s not wrong, humans makes mistakes all the time
minus-squarebountygiver [any]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 days agoYes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in. Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 days agoHe’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.
Wouldn’t be a proper Linus post without calling everyone else an idiot.
I’m sure he included himself in that group
Didn’t call everyone an idiot, but he’s not wrong, humans makes mistakes all the time
Yes, but allowing floodgates of AI work to come in it lowers the bar and allow more mistakes to flow in.
Just because humans make mistakes doesn’t mean we are ok with shipping mistakes
He’s not saying that, he is saying LLMs are a tool and can therefore be used. He’s not saying AI generated code gets a free pass into the kernel just because an LLM says it looks good.