• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s also remember that before the screens, we had shitty textbooks, and underpaid teachers and a serious shortage of supplies.

    Schools in the United States need more than a review of tech, but a complete overhaul and a budget that doesn’t look like Republicans are literally trying to kill the education system.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Jesus life in the richest country in the world sounds awful. Is there anything that works as it should?

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      before the screens, we had shitty textbooks, and underpaid teachers and a serious shortage of supplies.

      We used to have that. We still do. But we used to too

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      you only had those things if you were in a poor school district. also probably half your teachers or more were drunk townies who had no interest in educating you and were just there to relive their glory days as high school atheletes forever and ever.

      if you were in a rich one you had great books and great teacher and tons of supplies.

      the key to american education is to have parents who have a lot of money and put you in private school, or can afford a town with million dollar homes where the public school is excellent,

      simple don’t be born to a poor family and you won’t have a shitty education, and if you have to be born poor, at least do so in a major city where you can get into an exam school. major city exam schools are frequently rated as the best schools in the country, on par with the richest suburban school districts.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Texas used to define the content of school textbooks for the entire country.
        And the people who decided what went into those textbooks were not educators or even required to have any kind of degree. They are political appointees.

        Even worse, is that textbooks are not replaced with updated content every year. So, incorrect information lingers in the textbooks for years without correction. And then those textbooks are passed down to poorer school districts for even more years of use.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        This person isn’t wrong. I know most of school funding comes from property taxes which means more prosperous regions usually have schools with better funding. Moreover per family children are fewer (statistically) in more prosperous families. This makes the schools have more money per student in already prosperous communities.

        Federal and state grants may skew this but these have not been >2/3 of funding for a long while