• PostingInPublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 天前

      And they aren’t clear when to use them either, it’s kinda cute when they look at you questioningly if they did correctly after formulating a sentence.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 天前

        One of my Polish colleagues, who otherwise speaks pretty perfect English, seems to choose he/she/it at random when putting sentences together. Which is fine for objects, but misleading for people. “I saw a friend yesterday and she said such-and-such” for a male friend, and so on.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 天前

          Slavic languages notoriously have gender for every object. In russian “friend” have two variants, one for male gender, one for female. Same at least with Ukrainian and Serbian. So when I translate sentence to English (which only have one word for “friend”) I subconsciously use default word + she/he to empathize gender.

          It’s annoying habit, cause when I say or refer to “user” for example, I always assume it’s “he/him”.

          Guess same for your colleagues.

        • Dicska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 天前

          …which sounds surprising to me, because AFAIK Polish also has separate he/she words (on/ona).

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 天前

            I assume he’s aligning the pronouns to the gender of the noun, rather than the person. “Susie is a great worker, he’s very efficient” kind of stuff.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 天前

              I’d be surprised if there weren’t a female “worker” in Polish, “workeress” as it were, same for any other such nouns.

              • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 天前

                Depends on the exact word. For example, person is grammatically female, even if the actual person isn’t. Or, a lot of times you can make a different form, but you don’t strictly need to.

                It’s actually somewhat of an ongoing debate in places WRT professions: declaring whatever the current word is to be gender neutral, or having mandatory versions for both male and female (German /inen approach).

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 天前

      I think it’s the case with most Slavic languages. My wife’s native tongue is Serbian, and knowinf when and how to use articles was one the hardest parts of learning English for her.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      Most (if not all) Slavic-family languages do not. Neither do Japanese nor Korean. Some languages have a partial system (i.e. no a/an but the to show definiteness). Some languages have both but do it differently (Scandanavian languages suffix the definite article on nouns, but the indefinite precedes the noun like in English). Languages are messy and neat.