• folekaule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    My guess is not just traditional developers, but anyone doing any amount of coding, like data scientists, business analysts, etc.

    Especially if they’re using AI, those tools work better on Linux, or as is the case most places, wsl2 inside Windows.

    I believe Windows is kept because of the Office tools. However, Windows needs 12 layers of security tools that constantly get in your way, so the path of least resistance is to just stay in your wsl2 sandbox.

    The knee jerk reaction to this from enterprise IT is often to restrict access to WSL. This solves the problem, but creates disgruntled users who will continue to try and work around it.

    What they should consider, in my opinion, is giving these people real Linux workstations that can be enrolled in group policies, SSO, and all that good stuff. Commercial vendors of Linux will support these use cases.

    Some places roll out Macs, which work almost as well, but the hardware is more expensive. Hardware and commercial software support may be better, though, I don’t know.

    I think either is a superior alternative to Windows.