The documents I quote are from publications by the U.S. Copyright Office. But, the Berne convention and the WTO ensure that member states copyrights are aligned.
I doubt “allow for AI generated code” has the bipartisan support you think it does; it certainly doesn’t have the popular support. But, ever if it were legal, it should still be unethical (e.g. Amnesty International’s reports of human rights violations in generative AI), and I’d be attempting to avoid it.
It doesn’t look like it, but if 90% of silicon valley would get VERY upset if it didn’t and move their AI business abroad, you can be pretty sure that some kind of solution will get bipartisan support. Money money
The documents I quote are from publications by the U.S. Copyright Office. But, the Berne convention and the WTO ensure that member states copyrights are aligned.
I doubt “allow for AI generated code” has the bipartisan support you think it does; it certainly doesn’t have the popular support. But, ever if it were legal, it should still be unethical (e.g. Amnesty International’s reports of human rights violations in generative AI), and I’d be attempting to avoid it.
It doesn’t look like it, but if 90% of silicon valley would get VERY upset if it didn’t and move their AI business abroad, you can be pretty sure that some kind of solution will get bipartisan support. Money money
That’s a very “doomer” view of democracy, but you might be right.