- The Settlement embeds age assurance technology and age-gates into Meta’s social media products and requires all users—minors and adults—to undergo a rights-threatening age estimation process
- The Settlement places severe restrictions on Teens that can only be modified by the Teens’ parents and only then in exchange for giving their parents a ton of information about their online community and usage;
- The Settlement seems to empower the attorneys general to enforce Meta’s content restriction on “age inappropriate content,” categories that Meta itself has had trouble administering without excluding information about sexuality, sexual and reproductive healthcare, and abortion medication;
- The Settlement actually requires Meta to collect, analyze, and retain more information about its Teen users—when the pressure should have been on Meta to diminish its surveillance capitalism.
Do you consider Lemmy not to be social media? I guess that’s the for the most part, rather than time used?
Social media is a horribly unspecific term
I think the thought was anonymity and not posting personal information.
It’s kind of like how a forum isn’t usually considered social media.
A forum is considered social media.
Yeah I agree.
For me, it’s not so much that it’s social media but more it doesn’t have an agenda. No algorithms pushing certain posts up on my feed.