That’s dumb. The “work” in maintaining this excel file was the prompting and overall agent logic. In reality you’d be using something like openrouter and the instant claude “dies” for whatever reason you swap to whatever the freshest AI is. This never becomes ancient, it keeps up with the times.
I don’t know about that the entirety of European airspace was closed early in the year because of a pilot inputed some malformed data and it crashed both the primary and backup system. The backup system just fed the primary systems inputs into it, so that was inevitable.
That’s on you, when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards, it’s basic common sense. And if a script can’t do it then human, if you’re saving 90% of the time instead of 100% it’s still fine.
What a dumb comment. How am I wasting time if it saves time? Adding a small 5% overhead script to be able to save 90% of the original task’s time is not wasting time. Besides, you’re already using pydantic and structured json output anyway so half the veritication is free.
That’s dumb. The “work” in maintaining this excel file was the prompting and overall agent logic. In reality you’d be using something like openrouter and the instant claude “dies” for whatever reason you swap to whatever the freshest AI is. This never becomes ancient, it keeps up with the times.
I don’t know about that the entirety of European airspace was closed early in the year because of a pilot inputed some malformed data and it crashed both the primary and backup system. The backup system just fed the primary systems inputs into it, so that was inevitable.
I’m not sure what your point is. Garbage in garbage out, that’s just the law of computers. That would br the pilot’s mistake.
The point is there’s zero error checking.
That’s on you, when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards, it’s basic common sense. And if a script can’t do it then human, if you’re saving 90% of the time instead of 100% it’s still fine.
This is a perfect example of why I’ve never used AI and never will.
LOL. Sounds like you’re wasting 110% time here.
What a dumb comment. How am I wasting time if it saves time? Adding a small 5% overhead script to be able to save 90% of the original task’s time is not wasting time. Besides, you’re already using pydantic and structured json output anyway so half the veritication is free.
How’s it my job to fix the aviation industry?
On *them, but I think you knew that.