TL;DR this is a huge overhaul of the popular open-source audio editing app. The UI specifically has been the biggest overhaul, making it a lot more modern and friendly to use.

Hopefully, one day, GIMP will get some kind of update like this.

  • MetaStatistical@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got tired of Tenacity staying stagnant for months, and still having documentation link issues. Meanwhile, Audacity was actually making meaningful improvements.

    After diving deeper in the nontroversy, and seeing their in-depth video explaining their design decisions, I concluded that they genuinely want to improve the software and aren’t trying to fuck over the OSS community. So, I switched back when I dumped Windows and switched to Linux.

    There’s an extreme black and white view of these kinds of issues that crop up in the community that just pisses me off, and shoddy tech reporting doesn’t help matters. This wasn’t a “Oracle buys MySQL” situation, and the response didn’t deserve a fork. But, hey, it’s free software, and people can fork whatever they want.

    • Rose@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It wasn’t about “shoddy tech reporting”. Why would a FOSS audio editing app need to know your country, any personal “Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities’ requests (if any)”, share it with a wide network of people and potential buyers, as well as their “main office in Russia”? There should be no telemetry of any sort. Any logs kept should be strictly local, which would allow users to send them to the support team voluntarily.

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It was to support the auto-update mechanism IIRC. It has to reach out to a server to do that, and the rest of the terms are just legal CYA for what could be possible based on that.

        • Rose@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t see how an auto-update feature would need any of those things either. The request is made by the remote user to the Audacity update server. Of course, Linux servers typically keep logs, but that would be one line saying that in order for the app to check for updates or to be updated, an IP address and connection timestamp may end up on the update server.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You really don’t realize that your ip address can tell them which country you’re in? So that they’re obligated to disclose in the terms that they have this info, and that if for some reason police ever come knocking, police would also get this info. Takes all of a minute to think about this.

        • nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why would I want an auto-update mechanism in the software? That’s what my distro’s package manager is for. And it doesn’t care who I am or where I’m from. Nor has any other software I’ve encountered with such a useless-to-Linux-users mechanism demanded any information about me.

          In short, that rationale is obvious nonsense. That may be why they claim they’re doing it, but it doesn’t hold up.

            • Zagorath@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Yeah it’s a pretty wild mix of paranoia and technical ignorance from both Nyan and Rose here, hey?

              If you’re that paranoid and that ideologically “pure”, compile it your fucking self. They made it trivial to remove.

              • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I apologize for phrasing things so poorly that several people seem to have missed my actual point, which was: no one else with an auto-update feature requires any information about you, therefore if they claim that’s their reason for asking for users’ personal information, they’re lying. They may have other reasons, which they have not stated. They may even be good reasons, although I’m not holding my breath.

                And yes, I have compiled my own copy with that nonsense switched off, thanks for asking. However, it’s the job of people who understand that this is overreach to push back against it on behalf of the people who lack the knowledge, time, or energy to investigate it. I don’t like throwing even Windows users under the bus.

                • Zagorath@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  57 minutes ago

                  Nobody misunderstands you. You’re just wrong. An auto-update system, by definition, requires you send a request to their server. That gives them access to your IP address, which potentially gives them information including your location.