These projects get a lot of criticism.

Why, and is it deserved?

Try out Proton Mail, the secure email that protects your privacy:

https://proton.me/mail/TheLinuxEXP

Grab a brand new laptop or desktop running Linux: https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en

SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:

Get access to:

a Daily Linux News show

a weekly patroncast for more thoughts

your name in the credits

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@thelinuxexp/join

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thelinuxexperiment

Or, you can donate whatever you want:

https://paypal.me/thelinuxexp

Liberapay: https://liberapay.com/TheLinuxExperiment/

↑ GET TLE MERCH

Support the channel AND get cool new gear: https://the-linux-experiment.creator-spring.com/

Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

01:04 Sponsor: Proton Mail

02:16 SystemD (of course)

07:04 Wayland

12:27 Ubuntu

15:38 Snaps

20:24 Flatpak

24:11 Gnome

30:34 Conclusion

31:11 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computers

  • erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    sure, wayland isnt perfect and will never fully replace x11, but it does just work for most people nowdays

    is systemd that controversial? seems like a loud minority imo, most distros use it

    gnome haters will always be there, im one lol, but its pretty fine if you like it

    most of the hate twords ubuntu is directed at canonical not the software imo, but snaps i totally get, arent even fully open source with canonicals proprietary snap repos

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Wayland because it works for a majority (but not all) and still doesn’t have some basic functionality despite having been in development for near 20 years (eg custom window placement).

      It may eventually be good, but it is taking a goddamn lifetime to do it. Completely mismanaged imo.

      • mmmm@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Maybe what you call “basic functionality” isn’t as “basic” to implement in code. Or maybe there aren’t that many people that consider those functionalities “basic” (me for example).

        All in all the hate towards wayland just does more harm than good and people limited on complaining and hating maybe should consider ways of actually improving it.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          All in all the hate towards wayland just does more harm than good and people limited on complaining and hating maybe should consider ways of actually improving it.

          This is bullshit. I have no duty to be loyal to any project. Wayland in particular has been so mismanaged it’s still fighting for dominance after decades and still can’t reproduce the functionality we had in the '90s. All that effort could have been put into refactoring and updating X11 instead.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe what you call “basic functionality” isn’t as “basic” to implement in code.

          Everyone else has literally done it. Even X11.