It was only a matter of time before someone would point AI coding tools Photoshop and get it to build a copy. PhotoCraft is that copy – an open-source,
Why not just use GIMP? I don’t really use image manipulation and editing except for extremely basic things, so maybe GIMP has some important limitations I don’t know about.
I think GIMP intentionally forced upon itself different methods to Photoshop which was a possible mistake, users migrating to GIMP can find it foreign and unnatural and drop after a few uses and return to what they know. They should maybe have Winuxed it a bit more.
Does gimp support CMYK now? I’m a professional designer and that’s one of the reasons I didn’t use gimp. If you’re designing print media for a million dollar company, or if you want to do it right, you need to grade the colors correctly. By using rgb pics for printing you have no control over what the printer spits out.
Also: if you’re using the visuals for more media than online banners, like video, it’s just so much easier to import PSDs to After effects. When you’re paid by the work and not the hour, you can’t afford to export every layer from gimp to import everything to a different program and redo all the stuff you already did. Time is money
No fucking clue…like i said I only use it for extremely basic hobby editing so it may have limitations I don’t know about. But a simple web search suggests that GIMP indeed can support CMYK.
Why not just use GIMP? I don’t really use image manipulation and editing except for extremely basic things, so maybe GIMP has some important limitations I don’t know about.
GIMP is as robust as Photoshop, although from scratch or transition may be harder to use? paint net is a middle ground.
https://photogimp.com/
I think GIMP intentionally forced upon itself different methods to Photoshop which was a possible mistake, users migrating to GIMP can find it foreign and unnatural and drop after a few uses and return to what they know. They should maybe have Winuxed it a bit more.
Eh krita better but yes
Does gimp support CMYK now? I’m a professional designer and that’s one of the reasons I didn’t use gimp. If you’re designing print media for a million dollar company, or if you want to do it right, you need to grade the colors correctly. By using rgb pics for printing you have no control over what the printer spits out. Also: if you’re using the visuals for more media than online banners, like video, it’s just so much easier to import PSDs to After effects. When you’re paid by the work and not the hour, you can’t afford to export every layer from gimp to import everything to a different program and redo all the stuff you already did. Time is money
You can already do soft proofing and use ICC profiles in GIMP. There are also plugins. And seems like more CMYK features are under development.
https://docs.gimp.org/3.2/en/gimp-prefs-color-management.html
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GIMP/CMYK_support
https://www.phoronix.com/news/GIMP-Post-3.2-Features
https://developer.gimp.org/core/roadmap/
3.4: High-end CMYK support
No fucking clue…like i said I only use it for extremely basic hobby editing so it may have limitations I don’t know about. But a simple web search suggests that GIMP indeed can support CMYK.