• Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not using this doesn’t help with that though? It is already released, telling them not to make it would help but it’s too late now?

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        disagree, if they reimplement this as foss software and it crushes adobe it will be nothing but a good thing, sure ai overall is bad but ai was happening anyway and minimizing the harm of it by using it for actually good things for the foss movement is the least problematic possible thing to do with a highly problematic tech.

        • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Minimizing the harm means not using it. AI output doesn’t come out of nothing. It’s generated at significant ecological cost.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            They were going to use it anyway. The notion that your boycott will accomplish anything when the tool is this unbelievably useful is insane, fight this at the regulatory level, furthermore the ecological impact is quite minor if you use Chinese ai due to the solar farms.