• sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    In terms of thematic similarity, sure.

    But in terms of magnitude of the impact, microplastics aren’t nearly as dangerous as lead, asbestos, or cigarettes. Those lead to huge quality of life downgrades, and take decades off of a life.

    A society that replaces cigarettes with ubiquitous microplastics exposure will still improve the population’s health outcomes, by a lot.

    • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That may be true for now, but what happens long term? Articles I’ve read say that microplastics in the body only accumulate, and don’t really decrease. Maybe that’s just because we’re exposed to more everyday. But even then, reducing exposure will only get harder as more particles increase in the environment, from all the plastic breaking down. There must be some point at which effects start to show. What is the lethal dose? Or what is the dose that starts significantly increasing cancers? Or birth defects? Or something we haven’t even considered?