Linux memory management expert Lorenzo Stoakes at Arm who has been contributing to the kernel since 2014 is stepping away from some reviewership roles within the Linux kernel due to all of the noise from the flood of kernel patches resulting fro AI/LLMs.

Lorenzo announced today he is stepping away as a reviewer for the memory management (MM), core, misc, and Rust areas due to all the noise caused by AI. Lorenzo will continue serving as maintainer for areas of the kernel he oversees but is looking to lighten his load due to the increased patch burden in 2026.

Lorenzo commented in the patch series removing himself as reviewer for those areas of the kernel:

"Given the current throughput in the kernel resulting from AI-generated series, I unfortunately lack the bandwidth to generally be able to offer review except in those areas I maintain.

I have separated the patches into areas maintained by David, Andrew, and Alice + Danilo, so each can take the patches relevant to the subsystems, for convenience.

Apologies for doing this, but given the current trends I'd like to do something to make my inbox a little more manageable :)"

Lorenzo has been a longtime contributor to the Linux memory management code and also author of the book The Linux Memory Manager.

  • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
    2813·
    22 hours ago

    The Linux Foundation is the enshitification itself.

    We need that new organization however I wouldn’t know where to look right know: the FSF is full of libertarians. It’s a miracle that they created the GPLs. And the *BSDs are even worse.

    We’re in a dire need of something not tainted by braindead American ideologies.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      6·
      12 hours ago

      As long as two conditions are fulfilled, and I look at the track record here, I don’t give a shit about personal background:

      1. The organization does work that is either democratic socialist or is compatible with democratic socialism.
      2. The organization readily hires, has no negative selectivity when it comes to promoting, respects, includes, enfranchises, cooperates with, actual known track record dem soc people and projects.

      And this is 100% in line with my approach in general. Outside software, I consider Islam and Christianity to have negative doctrinal elements, but I 100% support Zohran Mamdani, Abdul el Sayed, and James Talarico. I don’t put a lot of weight on personal background, and do my best to judge based on track record.

      I consider libertarianism and ancappism to be highly toxic, but as a background, it won’t detract from the good work the folks are doing.

      For all I know, without some weighty evidence, these “libertarians” are closeted democratic socialists. We can’t throw orgs like the FSF, that have done amazing good work, under the bus casually.

      But if a new org appears that is explicitely dem soc, and they do good work, I wencome that. There is plenty of space under the sun for many good things.

      • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
        1·
        45 minutes ago

        You sound like a Dem. If you think Dems and whatever you call DemSoc are Leftists, oh boy, we need to talk.

        But I’m not throwing out the baby with the water, the FSF did many great things. But it’s limited in what they want to do.

    • Kajika@lemmy.mlEnglish
      41·
      22 hours ago

      Agreed, this is a kind of hegemony in which I grew up with the FSF and GNU being the good guys and the best we have so I can’t imaging better.

      To their credit they exist and their contribution is the best we have so far. Despite full of engineers the western communist movements can’t build anything. So W for the libertarians for that one. For now.