• frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The more interesting story here is that in 2023, FreeBSD was still using bubblesort. They made it go 100 times faster than a really slow thing, and we’ve known it’s slow for a long time.

  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the idea of FreeBSD, but I can’t see the point of giving up on my Linux conveniences to switch over to it. What advantages does it provide, and are they worth the switch, considering I’m losing a lot of software, as well as any semblance of gaming?

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The advantage is that you can rebrand it, close the source and sell it as your invention.

      Btw, did you know that Apple invented Unix?

      • MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apple invented Unix?? What the hell are you talking about?

        Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, Brian Kernighan, Douglas McIlroy, and Joe Ossanna at Bell Labs developed and invented Unix.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          !woosh@feddit.de ;)

          This was a joke about how Apple just takes open source stuff (in this case, they used FreeBSD as a basis for MacOS/iOS/iPadOS/tvOS/watchOS), rebrands it and then claims it was theirs.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What advantages does it provide

      ZFS, mostly. There are some smaller peripheral things (like much better manpages), but these days the big one is probably ZFS. Zero licensing conflicts allows it to be an integral part of the kernel.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        like better manpages

        I want them now! I want the better manpages! Has someone decided to create inproved manpages for Linux? I think this could be a great idea for a project or an organisation. Manprove, the organisation to improve Unix manual pages.

        • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t this actually impossible because manpages are maintained by distros? And the benefit of freedbsd being everything is created by the same team? Aka FreeBSD being a complete distro and not just a kernel?

          • raptir@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Linux is licensed under the GPL, which is described as “copyleft.” The GPL requires that if you want to use GPL code you need to license your modified code under the GPL.

            FreeBSD is licensed under the BSD license, which is a permissive license. Basically as long as you stick the license statement in your documentation you can do whatever you want with BSD-licensed code. This is why commercial uses (like the Wii’s OS) tend to be BSD-based rather than Linux-based.

  • nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still , as with Linux, you spend hours in configuring something that in windows just installs and runs … not saying windows is the best OS , but as all companies … it is less time consuming and everything just runs on it.

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It always funny to me to hear this sentence.

      Just look how it is to install software on Windows.

      You need to open the menu and type the browser name(/click on a shortcut), open the browser, search for your software, check you’re clicking on the right site and not some scam website, [sometimes you need to go few pages until you end up in the downloading page], clicking on the download button, and… *if* the download completed successfully… there’s still more…!

      Now installing…

      On Unix-like systems-

      <package-mangager> <install-command> <software-name>.

      Ex: apt install i3. That’s it!

      • Surp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’m pretty sure I could go Google and search for notepad + website and download plus install before you finish typing that. I use Linux Mac and Windows and Windows is definitely the easiest most user friendly. Mac is second (And by far most restrictive os) with Linux last for ease of use. Doesnt mean it’s bad but bro go tell my mom to type what you said and your argument crumbles. I can tell her to do what I said and she can get by.

        • UlrikHD@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You genuinely think it’s faster to make a Web query, wait for search results to show up, click and wait for the correct webpage to load, navigate to the download page, download the exe, run the exe and go through the pop up menu than it is to type apt install x?

          • Surp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah because I’d have to Google how to install X on Linux so I’d be stuck reading till I found the command. You don’t just guess what X is you either know or you gotta look it up. Most people are used to windows and it’s fine. Linux people that hate windows are just weird…they all do cool things but y’all crazy if you think 95% of people will be faster on Linux in the current state of the world. We have all been using Windows for 30 years.