All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

  • mlfh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thank fucking god for the EU, for fighting for global digital rights where nobody else does.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apple in 2027: This is not a battery, it’s a…umm … Ultra High Density Low Current Super Capacitor.

  • UnderScore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fact that some of the gen Z crowd think it will be horrible have forgotten that it was much easier to carry 2 batteries and swap them out vs carrying a charger and cable with you everywhere. Pop in the new battery, power it on and carry on with you now full battery phone. Being tethered to a wall so you can have 10% from 20 minutes of charging is crazy.

    • chaircat@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I used to do this. I thought it was awesome but I was literally the only person I ever knew who did this. It was not a popular thing to do.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My current device and the two before that all have had removable batteries. I’ve always thought built in batteries are stupid and it’s nice to finally notice that other people agree. Hopefully they next mandate that it has to be able to be taken apart with a screwdriver and spare parts must be able to be purchased straight from the manufacturer.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I prefer ip68 to easily accessible battery. I’ll need to change my battery maybe once every 3 years, but I need to know it can handle moisture far more often than that.

      • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Psst those Brands are not your friends and might lie about their reasons to make batteries non-removable.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love how higher IP rating is always the argument, it looks like everybody in this planet is doing daily deep diving and needs its smartphone to do that 😅

    • trashcan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Say, “We at Apple, Think Different.” and refuse to be shepherded into the flock with the likes of the dirty android heathens. You can’t give in so easily. First, they’ll take your Lightning ports, then they’ll take your internal battery and IP68 rating, and before you know it, they’ll take your blue iMessage bubble too.

      At that point, why even bother? You might as well throw a Qualcomm Snapdragon in the next iPhone and call it a day. Congratulations Apple, you have the best UI of any Android phone on the market.

      What the actual fuck?

      You swear this isn’t satire?

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        and before you know it, they’ll take your blue iMessage bubble too

        Nobody tell this guy what the EU’s Digital Markets Act means for Apple and iMessage…

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s NOT just phones.

    It’s EVERYTHING with a battery. Including cars, laptops, e-bikes, video game controllers, headphones etc. (im not even sure if there are exceptions, such as tiny tiny “airpod” like things… ?)

    And they must be (with a few exceptions) replacable by a “layman”, without the use of special tools - which means no heat pads, to soften up glue etc etc. (and for gods sake, i hope it also means apple can’t hardwareID lock a battery)

    an exception mentioned in the EU document about the law says, high power batteries for example in an electric car, must be done by a profesional - but of course it still has to be “replacable” and not… tear the whole car apart and rebuild it using new batteries.

    replacable batteries in headphones, bluetooth mice, laptops etc, is gonna be awesome.

    and lets not forget, they have to recycle the old ones - and produce new batteries using recycled materials.

    in fact, i will try to hold on replacing my current (2 year old) phone, and wait to get one before 2027. Usually the battery turns to shit in 3ish years.

    • zpiritual@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The cars will be fun to see unfold considering new EV platforms have them integrated straight into the platform the chassis is built upon.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Coming soon from Apple. Screws that require a 4D tesseract shaped screwdriver to undo.

    But if you can undo them, feel free to change the battery.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The EU defines user replaceable as you can remove the batteries with common tools. Common tools is defined as a Phillips or flathead screwdriver. So even Nintendo and their stupid try-force screw thing won’t be acceptable.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fuck the EU. I hope we still get good small phones and EU assholes only get big bloated as fuck ones.

    This is EU actively making my phone more shitty.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We need SD cards more. They removed them so they can charge you 300 $ to upgrade 128gb and to force you into shitty cloud service.

      Again, just anti consumer bullshit spearheaded by Apple and gargled by Samsung.

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “But it would be bad for my favorite trillion dollar corporation and for their bottom line!!!”

        I’ll never understand consumers who insist to take the side of the corporation rather than the side of the customer on these issues.

        • focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because this isn’t good for the consumer only short sighted leftists who love others taking control for them are cool with the government telling companies how they can make their products

          • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Instead of posting a rant about “short sighted leftists,” why don’t you explain precisely why it would be so horrible if users were able to install whatever operating system they wanted to install on the devices they’ve purchased with their own money?

    • __dev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You say that like Apple would have to put in a ton of work for that. Android can already run on iPhones. It’s just an ARM computer. Project Sandcastle already exists. All they have to do is allow unlocking the bootloader just like they do on macs.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Well, an unlockable bootloader that allows flashing any operating system would be nice. You can install Linux on a Macbook, so why not an iPhone?

      Hardware should not ever be locked to an operating system.

    • mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      or installing any OS you want without voiding the warranty? I mean when you buy a computer, no one cares if you install Windows or Linux. So why do smartphone manufacturers care?

      • qyron@lemmy.pt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Unless a lot as changed, they do care.

        Every single laptop and any prebuilt computer I find in the market comes pre installed with a Windows.

        A good friend approached me to install a Linux on a brand new machine and just to make sure we called the customer support line, informing there was interest to return the windows license, as the software would not be used.

        The reply we got was that by removing the software the warranty of the equipment would be null and void. The option was to ship the computer to their maintenance provider and have it removed, with costs presented at end for labour.