I just installed EndeavorOS on an HP Spectre360 that’s roughly 2 years old. I am honestly surprised at how easy it went. If you google it, you’ll get a lot of “lol good luck installing linux on that” type posts - so I was ready for a battle.

Turned off secure boot and tpm. Booted off a usb stick. Live environment, check. Start installer and wipe drive. Few minutes later I’m in. Ok let’s find out what’s not working…

WiFi check. Bluetooth check. Sound check (although a little quiet). Keyboard check. Screen resolution check. Hibernates correctly? Check. WTF I can’t believe this all works out the box. The touchscreen? Check. The stylus pen check. Flipping the screen over to a tablet check. Jesus H.

Ok, everything just works. Huh. Who’d have thunk?

Install programs, log into accounts, jeez this laptop is snappier than on windows. Make things pretty for my wife and install some fun games and stuff.

Finished. Ez. Why did I wait so long? Google was wrong - it was cake.

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    3·
    7 months ago

    That’s kind of true, but MacOS and Mac OSX are 2 different things

    Then Windows 3.0 and Windows 11 are two different things, so by that metric you can’t include Windows either.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      2·
      7 months ago

      Good catch, I guess that’s mostly true, but Windows NT was an evolution of Windows that mainly got rid of the DOS legacy. Which after Windows NT ran on a compatibility layer, where Windows 3 ran on DOS directly.
      It’s a bit of a grey area. But I’d say windows NT was a continuation of Windows that shared almost the entire API from Windows 3.0.
      The old “System n” OS was also called MAC OS. And the switch to OSX was a completely new OS where the old MAC OS software ran on a compatibility layer.

      I guess it can be seen either way.

    • oo1@lemmings.worldEnglish
      2·
      7 months ago

      I’d agree with that.

      I think the windows NT lineage should be considered separately from the MS-DOS based ones (pre win 2000).

      So I’d say MS-Dos family died with windows 2000. and the current windows lineage traces back to the early windows NT business oriented stuff - not back through windows 95.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
        3·
        7 months ago

        So I’d say MS-Dos family died with windows 2000.

        Did you mean Windows Me?

        2000 was NT-based.

        • oo1@lemmings.worldEnglish
          2·
          7 months ago

          yeah, that’s what i meant; 2000 killed off the old one.

          I forgot about Me though - never used it.