Tencent would be capped at a 10% stake. The Guillemot family would remain in control, just the way they want it.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m not a finance person, but selling equity capped at 10% isn’t a “buyout”, is it?

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The family is buying the shares as well, with Tencent having a minority ownership. Or might, rather. This is a consideration. It isn’t definitely happening.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        But I’m just asking, naively, is 10% a “buyout” by any reasonable definition of the term? I thought that was just a “stake”. I thought a “buyout” meant buying all of someone’s stake.

        • radix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Tencent and Guillemot combined are considering a buyout of other shareholders. Most of that is Guillemot, with Tencent increasing their share very slightly from 9.2% to 10%.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe Ubisoft should for once make a good game (OK, Rayman Raving Rabbids for Wii was a fun romp for a bit). I’m constantly baffled how a company this shitty that’s constantly making super derivative games got so big in the first place.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They sell to the type of person who only buys a few video games per year. They’re easy to play, they look nice, and they have a lot of content for the money, so you can stretch your dollar.