• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Absolutely. It’s a shit show.

      And interestingly, making the general public more aware of this is likely quite important. Because 1, they have very idealistic views of what research is like, and 2, just about everyone is entering research blind to the realities. It’s a situation that needs some sunlight and rethinking.

      IMO, a root cause is that the heroic genius researcher ideal at the base of the system’s design basically doesn’t really exist any more. Things are just too big and complex now for a single person to be that important. Dismantle that ideal and redesign from scratch.

      • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I kind of suspect things were always too big and complex for one person to address but the rampant individualism of our society obscures that history.

        • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Possibly, but when scientific knowledge and problems were smaller, one person could actually make a mark alone IMO. And if they happened upon a new discovery or insight then they’d appear to be geniuses, all alone.

          At some point, when the work to make a discovery requires more than one person and the amount of theory involved in understanding its significance is too much for one person to be authoritative on all of it, then it’s a team sport.