Jyek

Im just here to read all the complaints about the name.

Only takes one Karen to make the news in the South

If you’re confused about the down votes, it’s probably the way you worded this thought. Saying it’s a man identifying as a woman, implies you believe they are a man not a woman and are only treating them as a woman because that’s what they want. In reality they are a woman who identifies as a woman.

I think you being downvoted and not getting an explanation as to why might leave you to continue the same line of thinking without correction.

It’s not a bad question to ask how this will affect trans women though. I live in a place where there are a lot of TERF women who might want to take advantage of this service and would be offended to be picked up by a trans woman.

I don’t feel this way about discord communities I’m in. Maybe you should join smaller discord communities and actually make friends there. Hoping into a small group chat every once in a while to chat and make jokes or plan a dnd session or whatever. Does t need to be more than 10ish people to be enjoyable.

Far and away, business is the primary use case for PCs, education second, art and design art likely third, and gaming (while always growing) is still niche use case for PCs worldwide.

At best, gaming has over taken media consumption as a PC task but I think that has more to do with media becoming primarily, a mobile device activity in the last decade.

God damn these comments are bleak.

But they can cook

Just go into the store. They’ll sign you up.

You aren’t UwUing hard enough during the install.

What is this news outlet? This seems like just an outright lie…

Here’s another article from a more well known source saying the opposite is true. That they have no windows 12 release plans for 2026 and instead they’re trying to fix the issues with 11 and reduce the amount of AI is being pushed on the user.

https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/no-an-ai-focused-windows-12-is-not-coming-this-year-false-report-gets-the-facts-completely-wrong

I mentioned it to my partner the other day but medical contraceptive packaging looks remarkably similar to how storage media was packaged in the late 2000s and early 2010s.

Take the logos off and play a game of DVDs or Plan B?

Dang! That’s nearly half of your mom!

It’s dumber than that actually. LLMs are the auto complete on your cellphone keyboard but on steroids. It’s literally a model that predicts what word should go next with zero actual understanding of the words in their contextual meaning.

Banking apps and some authenticators won’t work on a phone with an unlocked bootloader.

It would be a keylogger within the IDE. How else do you prove you were the one doing the work? Otherwise, AI slop. I guess pick your poison.

You could time stamp changes and progress to a file. Record results of tests and output and give an approximate algorithmic confidence rating about how bespoke the process of writing that code was. Even agentic AI rapidly spits out code like a machine would where humans take time and think about things as they go. They make typos and go back and correct them. Code tests fail and debugging looks different between an agent and a human. We need to fingerprint how agents write code and use agentic code processed through this sort of validation looks versus what it looks like for humans to do the same.

This could, in theory, also be used by universities to validate submitted papers to weed out AI essays.

Maybe we need a way to generate checksums during version creation (like file version history) and during test runs of code that would be submitted along side the code as a sort of proof of work that AI couldn’t easily recreate. It would make code creation harder for actual developers as well but it may reduce people trying to quickly contribute code the LLMs shit out.

A lightweight plugin that runs in your IDE maybe. So anytime you are writing code and testing it, the plugin is modifying a validation file that shows what you were doing and the results of your tests and debugging. Could then write an algorithm that gives a confidence score to the validation file and either triggers manual review or submits obviously bespoke code.

Sounds like an excellent use of power and water and cou cycles in data centers.

But also, what’s wrong with having any of those things? I’d argue it’s better to have those things with less developer crunch. We don’t need children to form “attachments” to video game franchises. That just breeds loyalty to corporations. We need games that are developed with love and care by developers who treat their employees and customers humanely. Whatever that looks like, we want that.