they don’t even need to have passed the state bar in some counties

WTF

Like how many of your rulings in the past 10 years have been overturned

Can’t argue with that one lol

What makes you think he hasn’t already been given the favor years or decades ago and how he’s the one repaying it and he’ll get nothing in return?

Well I know all transactions have fees, I meant a fee charged as a commission to transfer it that goes to the developer.

Wallets get compromised, you might upgrade to a multi sig wallet or make a new shamirs secret sharing wallet. You might want to get more privacy after leaking your identity. All sorts of reasons to change it. Having to pay an extra 4% resale fee or whatever it is doing that wouldn’t be acceptable.

How can they force that and not also force a fee to move it to a different wallet you own?

People change wallets all the time and putting a fee on that would be inexcusable

If it’s a networked game, but there’s no reason a offline game shouldn’t work other than incompetence.

Also since the NFT is the DRM the game could be available for download outside of the publishers purview, such as a public torrent site.

You could sell the NFT and lose access to the game just like a disc

You wouldn’t be able to modify it as the nft would just allow you to download (edit and run) the game.

Edit: But allowing people to freely resale their digital copies would be a big win for people. No gatekeepers just like with discs

IF you’re correct, then hasbro would just force them to fix it, and it’d become a never ending game of whack a mole, where probably every update has to break existing mods based on the hack to further disuade people.

Are they worried people will bypass a speed limiter and go faster on the 1000w motor?

The only way this would be conceivable is if FSD actually worked, the robot works and change everything we know, or spacex is sending hundreds of ships to Mars each window.

Doesn’t seem possible, nor do I think solving only 1 of the above makes it possible.

Edit: or we wait long enough for inflation to make today’s assets at a future inflated value be worth that much without losing any of it in the meantime…

That sounds more appropriate ya

That’s not the internets fault though. That’s a people fault.

People aren’t willing to support the communities they want so they don’t get them as people find other ways to finance them.

It’s the internet that isn’t geared towards community anymore.

It’s more like people aren’t geared to community, not the internet.

Alternative Facts, not disinformation.

The satellites may be carrying starshields on them which are national security modules with the DoD. Shooting down the wrong satellite would be attacking US national defense infrastructure.

Nevermind starshields are whole DoD satellites.

I think when I read this, I replaced starshield with starlink

the ability to put a wide variety of instruments on the Starshield satellite bus

All these LEO satellites are so low it would only cause trouble for less than 5 years. That’s part of why they are low.

If we ever had something as dense as starlink 500km higher though that’d be a different story.

Okay dude, continue to have your raging hard on for hating Elon

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/pentagon-buys-starlink-ukraine-statement-2023-06-01/

I’ll wait for a verified source that shows spacex had a formal contract to supply starlink services to Ukraine with the DoD prior to this. I imagine I’ll die before you can do that since you can’t.

Edit: specifically before the event in question.

Lol, service absolutely can be turned on and off based on regions. SpaceX doesn’t turn it on in a region until the local government had an agreement with them. Just because the US gov sees Crimea as Ukraine does not mean SpaceX is obliged to turn it on there.

And no, there was no DoD contract in place at the time. SpaceX was providing services for free out of their own goodwill.

The DoD had a formal contact in place in June 2023, the incident falsely commented on by OP was in 2022.

Edit below

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

You can go read it all in the wiki yourself but the relevant part

In June 2023, the Department of Defense officialized a contract with Shotwell’s SpaceX to buy Starlink satellite services for Ukraine.[10] The deal includes the Pentagon buying 400-500 Starlink terminals for Ukraine, giving the Pentagon control of where Starlink works inside the country without fear of interruption.[79] The terms of services of the final contract were undisclosed for security issues.[10] Following the contract, The Pentagon stated Starlink was a “vital layer in Ukraine’s overall communications network” amidst “a range of global partners to ensure Ukraine has the capabilities they need.”[10]

Edit: oh, you’re OP. LOL

They lost internet because they went out of range of where it was on. They assumed it was on everywhere.

They strapped them onto boats where the internet was on, and drove them to where the internet was off. Then they begged SpaceX to turn them on, and they refused.

Not turning it on to allow the attack was in line with the terms of service and weapons export rules. SpaceX doesn’t want their consuner service to be considered a weapon.

Russia was getting satellites from 3rd parties and using them in ukraine because they work in ukraine.

Edit: and just to clarify, now that the DoD is managing this for ukraine through a contract with SpaceX, the DoD is allowing its use as a weapon AFAIK.