1·
1 year agoYes, I believe that’s the allegation made in the lawsuit, that they intentionally manipulated the algorithm in order to engineer this ad placement.
- 0 Posts
- 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: November 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·1 year agoPlanned release date: Jan 5, 2024 :/
7·1 year agoHitman 2. Now working on the third. It’s alright, I loved the first one, but it’s starting to get a bit boring/repetitive. The new freelancer mode in Hitman 3 seems somewhat interesting, but overall, there’s been very little change or improvement between the games. They are fascinating at first, but if you play too long you start noticing all the weird glitches in the simulation that break immersion and can either be exploited or just ruin the experience.
131·1 year agoThey were already monetizing your data, just like websites were already using cookies to track you before the EU made it mandatory to inform visitors about this.
Unless you audited the code or encrypted the files yourself, I wouldn’t trust it.
610·1 year agoWhatever helps you sleep at night, I guess.
An imagined scenario would be worse than reality
Gamers: “we want photorealistic 3D graphics in 4K resolution!”
Also gamers: “why do games take up so much space these days?”
4·1 year agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
Still no mean tweets tho
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Basically, Musk is alleging is that they claimed this was a common practice when it was, in fact, extremely rare.
In his tweet about this he said that out of 5.5 **billion ** ad impressions that day, less than 50 were objectionable according to Media Matter’s criteria. In other words, there was a 1 in 100 million chance that a normal user would randomly see something like this.
For comparison, the following things have about a 1 in a million chance of happening (i.e. are 100 times more likely):
I just read the MM piece and it doesn’t appear to make any specific claims about how frequently this might have happened, it merely says “We recently found ads for Apple, Bravo, Oracle, Xfinity, and IBM next to posts that tout Hitler and his Nazi Party on X.” and that “X has been placing ads for Apple, Bravo, IBM, Oracle, and Xfinity next to pro-Nazi content.” which does indeed appear to be factual since it makes no claims about frequency, so I guess we’ll see if the court is convinced that it was defamatory. It certainly seems to be the truth, but not the whole truth.
If it turns out they really DID have to create 100 million page views in order to find a single questionable ad placement, and they failed to mention that, you could make the case that they were intentionally trying to hurt his business.