Hot take, but the invasion of privacy only actually occurs when someone publishes the recording. Otherwise, making a personal recording of what someone can see or hear is no more invasive than them being there.
You can’t claim an expectation of privacy against someone when you’re stood in the same room with them.
“Upload your ID for every transaction to prove you’re not a sex offender”.
Don’t you know it.
Bathrooms smell after people have had a shit, even when they flush.
Bathrooms smell less when people flush with the lid down.
A man trap isn’t a style of lid though, it’s more about how it’s installed. The seat and lid are installed just a little too far back, such that the lid leans against the cistern but when you lift the seat it never full reaches 90°, and just falls back down. So guys always have to hold the seat up while they pee, and it’s always down ready for women.
A soft close lid is the cure for this, actually. The tension in the soft close mechanism keeps the seat up.
Anecdotally it’s pretty accurate, toilets smell less when the lids are kept down. Smell strength is directly proportional to the amount of particles in the air.
I lived in a house owned by a female vicar once, and all the seats had man traps. This is where the lid will stay up, but when you lift the seat up and let it go it falls back down. These seats would end up pulling the lid down also.
After a while I noticed that these toilets didn’t actually smell that much, because the lid was pretty much always down. By preventing the piss and shit particles from getting up into the air by the lid, this meant that you didn’t breathe in piss and shit, which meant that you didn’t smell it.
Before and after. Unless you like that little splash of dirty water on your taint.
At this point it’s pretty blatant that OpenAI are engaging in price fixing more than they are actually delivering AI datacentres.
And you showed it after you went through there and turned off all the legitimate interest ones…
Outside of the US that expression is rare as rocking horse shit.
It makes sense for Google to comply with the law. It would be good for Google to act in good faith, instead of facilitating frivolous spam complaints and preventing their legal resolution through subversive threats to the victim businesses on their platforms.
The article itself contradicts its headline. It says 31% of Gen Z regret voting for Trump, but that means 69% don’t regret it - and it gets worse for the other generations.
Thirty-one percent of Generation Zers who voted for President Trump say they regret it
So 69% of Gen Z that voted for Trump don’t regret it.
And that’s the biggest demographic that regretted it. The demographic with the smallest proportion that don’t regret voting for Trump.
So the vast majority of Trump voters don’t regret it, according to this poll.
Lisan al-Gaib!! /s
DMCA isn’t all that unreasonable, though. It’s Google’s implementation of their DMCA policy that fails everyone. The article explains this further, with how instead of adhering to the 14 day restoration requirement in the DMCA law, Google took 46 days to restore this app last time.
The legal remedy here is for the developer to sue Google alongside the false DMCA company. Unfortunately, Google’s response to this kind of thing is to usually ban the developer from Google servers, thereby cutting their future income.
TL;DR Google is the biggest cunt in all of this.
Aurora Store is good enough for most. It’s still on Google Play, but you’re not using the Google Play app and you can even pick which version and see an Exodus tracking report before you download.
Rather than finding the same app elsewhere, though, you should be looking for alternative apps on FDroid and the like. Unfortunately though FDroid is terrible for searching for apps, you just kind of have to “know” about the app you’re looking for first, somehow…
This is supported in AOSP now.
No it isn’t. GrapheneOS is directly based on AOSP, so it includes everything AOSP does. GOS devs have made it clear they want you to use gestures, and they only include the navbar at all because it’s still in AOSP.
Inverted navbar is in wide a range of other AOSP custom ROMs (including LineageOS, which could be confused with pure AOSP), because those developers chose to incorporate it. But it isn’t in AOSP by default.
This doesn’t seem like a mature thing to say just because you want to flip buttons and are annoyed that the privacy and security-focused project didn’t add a feature to flip buttons.
It’s an accurate take on their general attitude to polite requests on their github. And the reason the requests are so excessively polite is because people are treading on eggshells due to their diva reputation - albeit, this reputation is somewhat drowned out by their fandom.
It’s also not mature to downvote people just because you disagree with them.
And furthermore, the reason I use the navbar is because I want a force close long-press gesture on the back button, so I can more easily close apps and stop their background processes. To me, that’s a fairly important feature for privacy and security. That’s also likely a big reason Google pushed away from that, and to see GOS devs align themselves with Google in such a manner raises my eyebrow against them, at the very least.
Elements of it, perhaps, but things like the sandboxing are explicitly prohibited in other Android ROMs. Otherwise almost all custom ROMs would be using it, or some flavour of it.
other OSes
And this terminology kind of tells me you don’t really know the custom ROM scene.
That’s an interesting argument, however it probably wouldn’t go that far.
Taking it back to retro interpretations, sharing your photo with meta is basically the same as sharing your photo with a print company that takes and processes your negatives. They’re acting on your behalf in a limited scope, so sharing with them is the same as you doing it all yourself.
However it maybe comes back into play when that scope isn’t limited, as Meta require in their terms of service. It doesn’t matter what individuals say to Meta regarding their data, their prohibition is superseded by other users, who agree that they have permission to share other people’s information with Meta.
Meta isn’t breaking privacy laws - you are.