Did Mizuki actually say this lol? Wouldn’t put it past Project Sekai

Play League. Can confirm.

Well if there wasn’t a subsidy then it would probably be easier to have some long haul trucks switch to hydrogen or lithium ion or come up with something new. We could even subsidize those instead. I would probably do it over time, though, shrinking the subsidy a little bit every year. Eventually we would want some sort of environmental cost being factored in. With these changing slowly over time, it would incentivize new long haul trucks being alternative fuel while also not straight up destroying all current trucking infrastructure and fleets.

Is Stanford not neutral or independent? AFAIK the data is from Ipsos and they just made visualizations, though you can correct me if I’m wrong. I was just trying to say that the OP said the world whereas the person I replied to showed data from Americans specifically.

Edit: Ohhh I see it’s from Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) not just Stanford the University, my bad.

I could definitely see how this would be a biased source then:

“Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) is an academic entity led by an interdisciplinary steering committee of university researchers and industry experts.”

Luckily they only made visualizations from Ipsos’s data though I think?

Tbf they said “the world” not “USA”

"Globally, the share of individuals who see AI products and services as more beneficial than harmful has risen from 52% in 2022 to 55% in 2024.

https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report/public-opinion

Is he actually a Zionist? I’ve never seen him say anything like that

I hate this trend of putting shit at the beginning that I then have to hear again less than 10 seconds later. Like I get it’s for grabbing you but the second I start hearing the same thing again I immediately close the video.

ROYLGTCABV

Uhh I was thinking about the rainbow and how it shouldn’t be ROYGBIV cause Issac Newton randomly decided it should be 7 and then found that scientists now use ROYGCBV and I tried to make a new rainbow with just the primary and secondary colors RYGCBM but Magenta isn’t in the rainbow (cause it’s a mix of high and low nm wavelength light) so that leaves RYGCB but then it looked stupid without orange so I wanted tertiary colors so I added them to get ROYLGTCABV (There isn’t one past Red because it drops off a cliff toward infrared but there is a color past blue as it goes to ultraviolet: violet) Red, Orange, Yellow, Lime, Green, Teal, Cyan, Azure, Blue, Violet.

I still think it looks stupid. I think it’s because our red and green cones are right next to each other and blue is farther away so because of that we have a higher range of distinct colors in the red-green area than blue. (Useful for telling ripe fruit from foliage. We and primates got it as a mutation on the X chromosome and evolution must’ve made us keep it cause it turned out to be useful) So I think to make it even better it needs to not be halfway and quarter between red green and blue but weighted toward the red/green side. Very random thinking on this Saturday lol but that’s why it was in my clipboard.

Hey I’m confused, where are you getting July from? No offense meant btw, just trying to understand where I may be missing something? The article seems to have been posted yesterday and the death seemed to have happened last January but we didn’t hear about it because something something British courts as far as I could understand from the article

Jingle all the way!