Venus [she/her]

They didn’t say “I can’t use the railway” they said “the railway doesn’t run to [place the railway definitely runs to]”

But the person in the original comment is wrong. “The software and driver support isn’t there” means that appropriate software does not exist. If they were being honest they would have said “Ableton doesn’t support Linux and I want to stick with Ableton so it doesn’t work for me.” Their inaccurate comment could discourage people who do not have a strong preference toward Ableton from trying Linux.

All I know is that everybody says retirement homes are full of horny old people fucking all the time so maybe? Either that or old people just don’t care as much about attraction and are just happy all the parts still work

My guess is as an adult you’ll always be attracted to women around the 25-35 range most but maybe once you get old you’ll also find some stuff to appreciate in grannies

Yeah I honestly think they’d just reinvent the cow.

It’s an understandable answer that kind of misses the point. Cows are an incredible strain on the environment because of how fucking many of them humans breed in order to abuse and murder. But deleting cows would just prompt people to breed and abuse a different animal so it wouldn’t help that much

Is this actually true in the way that is intuitive or is it true in the same sense that if you have a petri dish with cancerous cells in it you can kill them with a handgun

Where did she think the other hole was

utorrent
piratebay

There are a million good programs and services out there, why use the ones that are completely shit in every way

I found a two civil cases where people were physically detained after refusing to show their receipt.

But I’m pretty sure that isn’t a civil issue. That’s a whole bunch of crimes, involving the violence committed in the process of detaining you and the kidnapping / imprisonment itself. What happens when you call the cops and say “this person tackled me leaving the store and accused me of theft, here is my receipt”

I mean it’s a cop so you never know, but what’s supposed to happen is that guy gets arrested for the unlawful violence he committed against you, and like definitely 1000% fired at least because every store has a policy against that shit

Backpack licenses

I already paid, this is my stuff, they shouldn’t be able to detain me without suspicion I stole something.

They can’t. That would be mega illegal. All they can do is ask you to stop and show your receipt, and you can just ignore them and keep walking. Or if you’re feeling extra polite, say “have a nice day” and keep walking.

If I ever encountered a voice comment in code I would immediately track that motherfucker down and do terrible things to them

Depends who’s asking

And also the other half

Death to amerikkka

I haven’t yet seen evidence they wouldn’t.

I just don’t know if I believe that their culture has exactly one garment considered modest.

That seems like a very disingenuous framing. Khaki pants are no more or less modest than jeans. A rule saying “don’t wear this specific article of clothing” is not a rule against dressing modestly, and I’m certain that there are plenty of modestly dressed children of all sorts of cultures at all these schools.

Sincere question. Obviously France is racist as fuck and instituting (or enforcing, whichever) policies in a racist way. But I’m seeing a lot of people saying that these outfits being banned are not actually religious at all, and are only culturally popular within the cultures of the people being targeted. If that’s the case, why are they still coming to school wearing them? If I were a kid and the government suddenly decided I’m not allowed to wear blue jeans to school, I’d wear khaki pants and then meet up with my friends and say “wtf is the deal with this new policy”

If they’re just clothes and not religious garb, why are kids still wearing them to schools which don’t allow them?

Based. Absolutely true, there is no good use for advertising.