Smart!!! And, I’m glad to meet a fellow chocolatey cheesey cracker enjoyer.
Smart!!! And, I’m glad to meet a fellow chocolatey cheesey cracker enjoyer.
😁
I’ll take a chocolate pudding cup and mix in some cheddar goldfish crackers. The strong flavor contrast and texture contrast makes it so fun to eat. Another option is to take cheddar potato chips and dip them into the pudding like a normal chip dip.
I investigated more and it seems that one can indeed perform NAT with Linux netfilter without the Masquerade action. If one knows the address of the interface, simply using the “SNAT” action with a to-address of the outbound interface will achieve the same result as using the “MASQUERADE” action, as long as the address of the outbound interface does not change.
But, this fact only matters for the actual underlying netfilter. I should have been thinking about OP’s application specifically. For OpenWRT it probably does just mean Checked->NAT, Unchecked->No NAT.
Oh, thank you! I think I mixed up the option with something else. I appreciate the correction!
Everything you’ve said here also aligns with my knowledge!
I can add some additional information.
The Masquerade option changes how the packet rule behaves when performing in a NAT situation. When Masquerade is off, the rule is configured statically with each interface’s address when the rule is loaded. When Masquerade is on, the rule is evaluated dynamically every time against each interface’s current address.
If you are routing packets through an interface, and the interface’s address is dynamic (which is the case for most residential internet connections), you should have Masquerade ON to be able to route packets after the interface’s address changes during normal operation.
I’m not aware of a setting that removes the app badge from all shortcuts, only the Edit option you found already.
I’ve also not used launchers other than Nova.
Is this what ArchLinux uses for its AUR? it looks similar
In this case the game is already available on other platforms. The pre-order risk in this case is for a bad performing port, not gameplay.
Simplifying doesn’t have to mean fewer lines. LGTM.
Your router and wireless access point seem OK. The switch looks suspicious, there is conflicting information in the description, some parts indicate Managed and some indicate Unmanaged. I caution against that switch specifically.