Anybody who associates with organized religion is one bad leader away from doing this shit.

Because that’s where all the users are. The “social” aspect of a “social” network. Anyone can host a forum but it’s useless without users.

If a social network is to take off, it must be accessible from mobile devices behind CGNAT (carrier grade network address translation).

I guess you’ll have to start spending more time in high school bathrooms.

That would be communism!

It’s a good thing you aren’t a building engineer.

Ullluvunn!

That won’t happen because Apple and Google hate open source.

Have you seen Waymo?

Women can’t even do their civic duty without some fucking weirdo sexualizing them.

Statements made in quarterly financial calls are a very particular level of legally binding, so CEOs sound like that because they are terrified of making promises that won’t be kept.

Keep in mind that in quarterly financial statements, any forward-looking promises made are pretty much legally binding so CEOs never give specifics.

You need an internet break.

My guy, you posted your address. They are just telling you. Clearly the direct statement was needed because you are still being too thick to figure it out.

Maybe not bombs, America’s style is more using the CIA to destabilize elections and arm fringe militia groups to cripple other countries. It’s really cool and good that I’m forced to support that every time I go to work and pay taxes.

I was just happy to act as a downvote lightning rod while adding to your excellent list :)

Correct, I could have been more specific.

Do you actually believe the ship wouldn’t be intercepted with implied violence?

Let me guess, you also believe Republicans when they say abortion will be “left up to the states” right?

You left out Afghanistan to be irrefutable, but…gestures at $3TRILLION bill with nothing to show for it.

If I were to start a business out of Miami, Florida that sent an oil tanker to Cuba, what would happen to that oil tanker?