Sha256 is a hashing algorithm. Not a public/private key algorithm.

Swords had phrases written on them too. This has been happening since forever.

“in 20 years” doesn’t get as much hype as “in 3 months”

Maybe if they said “in 3 months” instead we would’ve actually have had it in 20 years. Seeing how much ai attracts money with these obviously unbelievable promises.

From the makers of “fusion energy in 20 years”, “full self driving next year” and “AI will take your job in 3 months” cones “all code will be AI in 6 months”.

Trust me, it’s for real this time. The new healthcare system is 2 weeks away.

EDIT: how could I forget “graphene is going to come out of the lab soon and we’ll have transparent flexible screens that consume 0 electricity” and “researches find new battery technology that has twice the capacity as lithium”

Historically speaking, that will just make the next leader give many powers to the military in order to “bring peace” so whatever happened to the last one doesn’t happen to him.

In these situations, governments treat things like “Whatsapp” or “telegram” as social media.

They don’t ban social media so tech corps don’t fuck their population. They ban social media so their population can’t organize against them.

Or you can just uninstall edge.

Migrant to me is the more accurate word.

Migration can be seen from 2 viewpoints, “emigration” and “immigration”. Depending if you are looking from the country of origin or the destination.

However, in this headline neither the origin nor the destination is mentioned, therefore it doesn’t make sense from either point of view. Therefore the viewpoint-agnostic “migrant” makes more sense to me.

That sounds like such a stressful life. Having to constantly police not only your property but your neighbours property.

And that just won’t work when the aggressor is mightier than your local community, which doesn’t sound hard at all. Or if your neighborhood is more friendly towards your aggressor than towards you. Which would also end up in constant drama.

I don’t like your solution at all.

We’ll. Since I’m uneducated, you could try explaining why I’m wrong instead of making fun of me.

If there’s no state to protect your possession, you are the one responsible for protecting it. The moment you lose physical contact, you cannot protect it. Unless you put traps all over your house to deter an invader.

I don’t see how in a stateless society you could go on vacation without the fear of your home being “stolen” when you return.

Aren’t taxes and zoning non-existent under anarchy?

If there is no state, there is no one to pay taxes to. And if there is no state, there is no one to make and enforce zoning laws.

If property doesn’t exist, you can’t go on vacation though.

When you leave your house, someone else can just come in and take it for himself.

You couldn’t even go for a walk. The moment you leave the house you stop “possessing” it.

I haven’t done the experiment, I’m curious to know if you can take a random binary compiled for Linux 10 years ago run on the latest version of popular distros. See in which ones it runs.

Non profits do have corporate leeches too. The executives at Mozilla have executive salaries. That is, hundreds of thousands, or millions.

They don’t work out of the goodness of their hearts. And Mozilla has to find a way to earn the income to pay their bloated salaries.

It is affected by gravity. But does it have gravitational pull? The thing about black holes is that they have a lot gravitational pull.

I’m asking because I honestly don’t know.

Your Airbnb was someone’s home.

The comment you replied to originally was talking about why billionaires should support a democratic society.

If the society is not democratic, it would be authoritarian. Therefore what I explained could happen.

A billionaire cannot exist in 2 countries at the same time. It doesn’t matter if his company is multinational, he isn’t.

If you jail that billionaire, which is not hard as a state if said billionaire resides in your country, you can “convince” him to give even assets in foreign countries.

That’s why they removed his passport.

I’m not talking about the technical possibility. Of course you can have multiple video stream, one per participant.

I’m saying that without multicast, it can be more resource intensive than having intermediate servers that can multicast on the application layer.