

How do you respond to that which means jackshit?


How do you respond to that which means jackshit?


Parks & Rec says diff’rent


Hey, Get ur own YSK!


Glad hes getting to them. Fuck Nettanyahu and his entire shitty party. Next leader needs to ensure the ultra-conservatives who get taxpayer funded handouts and dont have to enroll in service are introduced to consequences


Can you elaborate on how “Calzone” constitutes heavy lifting
If anything, i probably should have “” panzerotti or at least both. In any case, its odd you centered out CalZone and not panzerotti all things being equivalent


Bonnie Engleheardt
Because the good governor endorsed Mandamni. Also this p.o.s. only donated $1000
C’mon dudette, nobody cares about your “photography” or pro-genocidal tendencies and political education your rich late husband indoctrinated you into. Learn your place


Whats stopping a non-nation related collective of “hobbyist drone” operators from remotely assisting in the variably-casualty-induced defensive endeavors?
Just call them contra-larceny strike foece


Voting habits and proper placing of blame will need to adapt


AMA should have a rule that questions should be answered in sequence, maybe requiring the host to confirm they ignore questions before they move on to more “flattering” ones
Otherwise, its AskMeOnlyWhatIWantToAnswer.
Kinda defeats the purpose otherwise


Society desperately needs a spray-on defertilizer/spayer/neuterer


Isnt is unallowed for a Jew to charge another Jew intere$t?


I speak Republican
Love this. Might actually watch a debate if the R doesnt back down. Should be an engaging and even-handed affair


Its sad they think their ambush was any kind of gotcha for the Zell, they embarassed the shit out of themselves.
I still jokingly ask if someone even said thank you when presented with a basic reasonable inquiry I cant answer or want to ironically/arbitrarily rebuff


So they’re dead?


How do they square that with freedom of speech or like, defenses of fact?
Like how defense of fact is a valid defense against libel laws since the speech at issue was based on known facts or “truth”
Sounds terrible, it should be on inside!